Search results

Not one rapture to be seen. 2 Thessalonians 2:3 Greek 646 [e] apostasia ἀποστασία apostasy N-NFS Thayer's Greek Lexicon STRONGS NT 646: ἀποστασία ἀποστασία, ἀποστασιας, ἡ (ἀφισταμαι), a falling away, defection, apostasy; in the Bible namely, from the true religion: Acts 21:21; 2...

As exemplified by the apostate papacy. “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate (On the Authority of the...

So that's a "no". That leaves only one alternative. You believe that The Most Holy Anointed One is antichrist.

So you believe that The Most Holy Anointed One is the Messiah, is a wrong interpretation. Here's the question for you: Do you believe that The Most Holy Anointed One is the Messiah? Yes or no?

I showed you what the actual Hebrew says. You are going to argue that the Most Holy Anointed One is not Messiah? You are going to argue that "holy holies" is holier than Messiah?

They err. It is a reference to Messiah, the Most Holy Anointed One. There is no one and nothing Holier. Daniel 9:24 Hebrew-Aramaic 6944 [e] 6944 [e] 4886 [e] qā·ḏā·šîm. qō·ḏeš wə·lim·šō·aḥ קֹ֥דֶשׁ קָֽדָשִֽׁים׃ וְלִמְשֹׁ֖חַ Most the...

Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. So...

I'm glad you agree with what I'm saying.

Yes, Greek didn't exist until the church invented it. :laughing: Yes, grammar didn't exist until the church invented it. :laughing:

The oldest NT manuscript is Greek, not Aramaic. There is no NT Aramaic manuscript which pre-dates the oldest NT Greek manuscript. The NT authors wrote in Greek, not Aramaic. Meanwhile, you haven't passed the basic grammar antecedents/referents tests in Daniel 9:25-27.

But you haven't. :laughing:

Most certainly. The entire historical true Christian Church prior to the 19th century. You're in great company.

Let's examine some of your claims. What are the ten horns of Daniel 7?

Do you think that is not also true of the revelations to the saints of the true Church over two millennia? Not one of whom agrees with you? Are you a holier man than they?

I'm referring to what transpired when the temple rebuild was attempted.

Did the Holy Spirit agree with what transpired?

Let him roll the dice. I'm stocked up on popcorn. Sozomen (ca. A.D.375-447) "Ecclesiastical History" Book V, Chapter XXII Though the emperor [Julian the Apostate] hated and oppressed the Christians, he manifested benevolence and humanity towards the Jews. He wrote to the Jewish patriarchs and...

Unsurprisingly, you're unable to find any support for your claims. Thus, you offer nothing but the personal opinions of private interpretation. (2 Peter 1:20)

Quote just one reformed blasphemy which attributes all of the names of Christ to a Reformer or to anyone else. Just one. Name, source, date, and verbatim quote, please. Name just one recognized expositor in the annals of historical Christian orthodoxy who makes the same claims. Just one...

For some reason, you refuse to comment on the blasphemies of the papacy. What are you afraid of? Could it be that you agree with them?