Search results

Father forgive AJ, she doesn't know what she is doing!

There is no point explaining AJ. Your mode is telling people, it is not one of making enquiry. You operate from the position of understanding all. It disables your ability to see other possibilities. If I was to explain the point, nothing would be achieved except another round of excessive words...

You miss the point!

Hebrews 2:14 Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his death he might break the power of him who holds the power of death—that is, the devil—

Death is alien to God....in any realm

hmmm, at each stage of Creation God said all he had created was very good....ie, no death! I wonder how that fits in with flesh tearing dinosaurs?

What Does 'Surely Die' Mean? The statement 'surely die' is self explanatory.....unless one has twisted the terms to mean other than the obvious......and as we have observed on this site over the years, the lengthy and convoluted explanations given to nullify the meaning of these two simple...

It's no doubt hard work when avoidance and denial hidden behind lots of words are your primary drivers. That way you don't have to look at anything you feel threatens your paradigm. You can just do the giggle and side step and carry on without addressing anything real.

S So you must be inspired by me...:Broadly: ....or maybe you don't recognise the nature of inspiration?

So if you aren't inspired by the Holy Spirit, what are you inspired by?

Let me ask you this AJ, are you inspired by the Holy Spirit?

What I'm saying is the God did not control the Prophets pen. They wrote from their paradigm.....as do we all. Jesus is the only eye witness of God. It Is he who reveals Gods heart and intentions. Understanding the Prophets must be filtered through the reality of Jesus.

As much as this is true, the reality of this sword cutting both ways is pertinent. In other words, when one's primary agenda is defending oneself or ones group under the belief of being guided by God, how can one definitively know that one is not being deceived by the disguise of 'an angel of...

I would go so far as to question whether what is attributed to God is God's doing. If Jesus is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow and God does not change, then questioning these attributions is mandatory if one aspires to consistency.

My evidence is you do not use the fulcrum of Jesus to draw your conclusions.

Then why not interpret scripture accordingly?

In the context of which we are speaking, you figure it!

I disagree. It is ones paradigm which informs ones conclusion.

Knowing the score does not qualify for blaming. There is of course the Accuser and it is not God.

hmmmm, so someone needs to be blamed in a convoluted manner?