Search results

Fair enough. But what do suppose would have happened if David committed adultery and murder again after such a free gift was given? “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but...

I prefer how God describes his word much better: “The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes.” (Psalms 19:7-8)...

He does that frequently…

@Behold Just acknowledge the mystery of God and of Christ like “Pauline theology” teaches us: “That their hearts might be comforted, being knit together in love, and unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding, to the acknowledgement of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of...

Why didn’t any of the inspired writers say it as plainly as you just did? :IDK:

Tool: A person used as an instrument by another person. “God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ” (Romans 2:16) “And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ” (2 Corinthians 5:18) Sound like a tool to me…

If you use a tool to make something, did the tool make it? :IDK:

You have a great imagination… :hmhehm

:hmhehm

The New Testament Greek text gives us “Lord” when citing Old Testament passages containing the 4-letters of God’s “name”. It was not “extremely important” to God to reveal his name, so why do you belabor this matter? :IDK:

:kiaora:

Yes. They are plain to believers. Thus there shouldn’t be any bickering over them amongst believers.

:IDK: :pursuit:

Over plain things regarding holiness? Absolutely! What I said was, we are not bicker over ambiguous and mysterious things in scripture.

“The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.” (Psalms 12:8)

We are not to bicker and divide over the mysteries and complex sayings in scripture. We are to unite in the plain, unambiguous, doctrines that promote holiness.

Not so brother. Those sacrifices could never take away sins. They were only temporary atonement. “For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.” (Hebrews 10:4) This is why ALL of mankind needed the blood of Christ to take their sins away: “…John seeth...

This was in regards to his flesh. Not spirit. No one escapes spiritual consequences for sin without Christ’s blood atonement. NO ONE. That repentance will no longer be available to the backslider: “For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly...

David’s sins weren’t forgiven until Christ was crucified and he believed the gospel: “…the gospel [was] preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.” (1 Peter 4:6) You are in error to believe the...

“if indeed you continue in the faith grounded and settled, and are not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which you have heard and which was proclaimed in all the creation under Heaven…” (Colossians 1:23)