Search results

Funny, comping from a Protestant, whose very doctrines and beliefs depend on the Catholic Church who declared the Canin of Scripture. You wouldn’t even know what a Bible was, had it not been for the Catholic Church . . . Ummm, we don’t “worship” anybody or anything other than almighty GOD...

Apparently, you went through all of the motions if being “Catholic” – but unfortunately, you didn’t actually learn anything. You went through years of ignorance, which finally led to your being seduced out of the Church. You were born-again at Baptism - just as Peter proclaimed in Acts 2:38. As...

Uhhh - NO you're not. I've been proving you wrong about Sacred Tradition for weeks now and you still refuseto accept the truth . . . You keep misrepresenting Sacred Tradition by conflating it with tradition (small "t").

Thank you. Thant answers everything.

Your refusal to divulge your denomination/faith tradition speaks VOLUMES . . .

This has become a useless conversations. Your rejection of the truth of Scripture shows that your problem is with God – not with Paul and not with me. I suggest you take it up with HIM . . . Prov. 26:4 Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him.

Once again - GOD is the one who says that HE is the Author of Scripture. This isn't something that I made up out of thin air. 2 Tim. 3:16 ALL SCRIPTURE IS GOD-BREATHED and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness YOUR problem is with GOD Himself - not me . ...

And YOUR opinion doesn’t matter ONE bit without evidence – which you have failed to present. What denomination/faith tradition are you involved with?

It is completely evident that you don’t have the wisdom to discern Scripture – or even the basic logic. These aren’t “contradictions”, so much as they are different vantage points of the truth. If you were to question 10 eyewitnesses to a car accident – you would get 10 different VERSIONS – but...

Paul is warning the Corinthians not to receive the Eucharist unworthily – dui to their SINS. It had nothing to do with the bizarre idea that only a FEW of them were allowed to receive. He is telling them to make sure they don’t have unconfessed or unrepented sin. Sin doesn’t just “disappear”...

And NOWHERE does Jesus indicate that the rest of us are "forbidden" from parttaking in the Eucharist. Face it - you math doesn't work. Paul instructs the entire Church at Corinth to receive the Eucharist (1 Cor. 11:17-34). That was only ONE Church out of MANY. The Church at Ephesus...

God Himself disagrees with you . . . 2 Tim. 3:16 ALL SCRIPTURE is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness The Holy Spirit is the Author of Scripture - NOT the scribes who wrote it down.

And it doesn’t matter if Paul doesn’t call his writings “Scripture”. The Holy Spirit is the Author – NOT Paul. The fact remains that Paul’s writings ARE Scripture – and the Holy spirit meant what He said about Oral Tradition being equal to Scripture in 2 Thess. 2:15.

Your perversion that only a select few of Christ’s followers are invited to partake in His Body and Blood is a complete heresy and is NOWHERE taught in Scripture.

This is the most asinine argument I’ve ever been involved in with regard to the authority of Scripture. YOU ignorantly believe that each Book of Scripture doesn’t convey Truth – unless it is read in chronological order. EACH Book is Scripture individually. – and they are ALL Scripture...

Uhh, no – you didn’t show me where it says that ONLY 144,000 can partake in the Eucharist. You’ll have to explain why Jesus taught the crowds – not a select few – that they MUST eat His flesh and drink His blood to have eternal life (John 6:53-57). You’ll also have to explain why Paul preached...

I guess I’m not really sure why you even brought up 2 Tim. 3:16 in the first place. The debate it about whether Paul was placing Oral Tradition on the same place as that which is written (Scripture). They BOTH amount to the Word of God. One is spoken – the other is written.

You’re changing the argument. Your initial argument was that nobody is to receive the Eucharist EXCEPT for the 144,000 – a claim that Scripture NEVER makes.

And where does Jesus tell the Apostles that NOBODY else can receive the Eucharist except fpr them and the 144,000 from Rev. 7??

You're just angry that I exposed you. Again - From YOUR post #827: “2 Tim. 3:16, where Paul DOES mention graphē (= Scripture).” From YOUR post #847: “The ONLY thing I have been concerned with here -- and the thing you just can't seem to focus on, no matter how hard I try to focus you -- is the...