Search results

The Assumption of Mary itself is not found on the pages of Scripture – but the effects of her assumption ARE. The dogma of the Assumption posits that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was assumed body into Heaven. She did not ascend on her own, like Jesus. She was assumed into Heaven by the power of...

Either you're just really stupid or a complete LIAR. Again - I thnk it's a little of BOTH . . . Ummm, I already told you His name is Jesus. As for Peter - he obeyed Jesus. He wasn't disgusted in Jesus the way YOU are. Of you get "re-Baptized" - -you're only getting WET the second time around...

I KOVE catching anti-Catholics in idiotic LIEs. Ummmm, can you tell me the difference - and when the "Catholic" Bible came into existence? Try not to hurt yourslf . . .

Not only does the Catholic Churh teach these points - it introduced the WORLD to these truths. NOT sure why YOU think Christ’s Church is “NON-Scriptural”. There’s plenty of Scriptural evidence for the Church (Matt. 5:14, Matt. 16:18, Acts 9:4-5, Acts 20:28, 1 Tim. 3:15, Eph. 1:22-23). With...

I probably should - but exposing his idiocy is more satisfying . . .

I would say that this is the case in every Protestant denomination as well. What's youre point? Such as? Can you name one? Again, I thing you're conflating disciplines and minor traditions with doctrines . . .

According to YOU. Acciediung t Jesus - he said the following: Matt. 28:19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit I'll take Jesus over an ignorant little internet poster . . .

And YOU adhere to a Canon of Scripture that was compiled and declared by the Catholic Church. This is why the Scriptures refer to the CHURCH as - - The Body of Christ and He is the Head (1 Cor. 12:12-31, Eph. 4:3-6, Col. 1:8). - The Pillar and Foundation of Truth (1 Tim. 3:15). - The FULLNESS...

And are YOU aware that some priests are just wrong? Disagreeing with a discipline or an opinion of a Bishop or Pope is one thig. But, rejecting doctrine ir dogma is heresy. That doesn''t "change".

Actually, an anti-Cathollic is sperson who ignores certain verses of Scripture and actually LIES about history as it pertains to the Church - gping so far as to dismiss the corroboraton of the Early Church Fathers. They also lie about Catholic doctrine. Rejecting Catholic doctrine make one a...

Please show me this teaching from the Catechism whhch, I promise you, does NOT exist. In short - put your money where your mouth is - or simply admit that you're nothig but a LIAR . . .

Do you believe that George Wasgungton was a President? WHY?? Were you there? Do you believe that Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence? WHY?? Did you see him do it?? Do you just deby history that involved faith in Jesus Christ - or do you reject ALL of it? Why do you believe...

The fact that you STILL don’t understand what “In the name of” means - even after ALL of the instruction I’ve given you from scholar after scholar shows me just how “smart” you’re NOT . . .

I already PROVED in my last post that they understiid indeed what "in the name of" meant. Your opinion of me is nothing moire than something stuck to the bottom of my shoe . . .

Ahhhh, yes – the old, “I CAN’T argue with that so it’s NOT true!” defense. Pretty pathetic – even for a Biblical and historical lightweight like YOU . . . MOST of the Church Fathers in the first 3 centuries were martyred for their faith in Christ. Not bad for a bunch of “reprobates” . . .

You’re either a liar – or justr REALLY stupid because I already told you His name. I think it’s a little pf BOTH . . .

Ummmm, the document is called, The Teachings of the Twlve Apostes or The Doctrine of the twelve Apostles. And YOU don't think they had anything to do with it? Why are there ZERO rebuttals to this document? Surely, the surviving Apostled would have condemned this wirj if it was NOT orthodox...

And that's precisely what I was talking about, Einstein . . .

Uhhhh, no kidding, Sherlock, I never made that claim. It;s funny - the people in ithe FIRST century understood what "in the name of" meant - even though it completey stupefies a peson like YOU. Observe these excerpts from the FIRST century Church document, the Didache . . . "baptize into other...

Let's just say that you're right about the dating. There were still Apostles walking the earth. Can you show me a contemporary writing from that period that either contradicts ir condemns the Didache? Ignatius of Antioch, who was ordained by Peter and was a lifelong disciple of the Apostle John...