Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    Division: argument based on the assumption that what is true of the whole must be true of the parts. Your logical fallacy is composition or division Doubtable Statement: To accept statements at face value which should be doubted given background information. Equivocation: use' of a term in...
  2. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    Burden of Proof: The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever or the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove. Your logical fallacy is burden of proof Circular...
  3. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    1. Ad hominem abusive: argument that an opponent's view is incorrect because of some personal defect of the opponent. Your logical fallacy is ad hominem 2. Ad hominem circumstantial: attack on a claim on the ground that the opponent is prejudiced in the question because of his special...
  4. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    Other Fallacies by those in Cults like the watchtower. Website on fallacies with examples Partial List of Fallacies and another is here Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies Accent: ambiguity arising from special stress of words in a sentence, misquoting, taking out of context, emphasizing...
  5. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    Poor Math, it is really 1^3 I posted a ton of true facts that proves the Trinity. In fact, you are blinded by your invincible ignorance. Defined: invincible ignorance fallacy: also known as argument by pigheadedness, is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply...
  6. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    So What Noah was not teaching flasehood, you are. Comparing yourself with Noah is just funny.
  7. T

    My agnostic friend says: "I don't need it." - How would you respond?

    Brother, use a what if there is a Heaven and Eternal Punishment. Which way would he want to place his bet?
  8. T

    Where does the Pope get his authority?

    http://www.ralphwoodrow.org/assets/books/babylon.html https://archive.org/details/babylonconnectio0000wood https://www.equip.org/PDF/DC187.pdf https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/did-the-catholic-church-have-its-origin-in-paganism...
  9. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    Point was Baptised in all three titiles of the Trinity.
  10. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    Maybe in the galaxy Satania! lol
  11. T

    Where does the Pope get his authority?

    Ok that link is just werid.
  12. T

    My agnostic friend says: "I don't need it." - How would you respond?

    try saying to him, I really want to see you in Heaven. Would you like to know How to get there?
  13. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    https://www.bible.ca/trinity/trinity-jw-anti-trinity-booklet-master-index-quotes.htm https://www.bible.ca/trinity/trinity-jw-anti-trinity-booklet-statistical-review.htm https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/in-defense-of-the-trinity...
  14. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    https://www.bible.ca/trinity/trinity-jw-deceptions.htm#author This is an overview of Weigall, Arthur: The Paganism in Our Christianity The Twelve Disciples Derived From Zodiac: p25 . The 27 books of the New Testament Canon is invalid: p37 . The name Mary is of pagan origin: p41 . The virgin...
  15. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    Worship God on His Terms Therefore, if we want God's approval, we need to ask ourselves: What does God say about himself? How does he want to be worshiped? What are his purposes, and how should we fit in with them? An accurate knowledge of the truth gives us the right answers to such questions...
  16. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    Because of his unique position in relation to Jehovah, Jesus is a "Mighty God."-John 1:1; Isaiah 9:6. But does not "Mighty God" with its capital letters indicate that Jesus is in some way equal to Jehovah God? Not at all. Isaiah merely prophesied this to be one of four names that Jesus would be...
  17. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    Someone who is "with" another person cannot also be that other person. Note, however, that here again the context lays the groundwork for accurate understanding. Even the King James Version says, "The Word was with God." (Italics ours.) Someone who is "with" another person cannot be the same as...
  18. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    "I Am" AT JOHN 8:58 a number of translations, for instance The Jerusalem Bible, have Jesus saying: "Before Abraham ever was, I Am." Was Jesus there teaching, as Trinitarians assert, that he was known by the title "I Am"? And, as they claim, does this mean that he was Jehovah of the Hebrew...
  19. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    In this regard, Ralph Martin, in The Epistle of Paul to the Philippians, says of the original Greek: "It is questionable, however, whether the sense of the verb can glide from its real meaning of 'to seize', 'to snatch violently' to that of 'to hold fast.'" Trinitarians take both the active and...
  20. T

    There is no spiritual gift called "the gift of tongues".

    "Making Himself Equal to God"? "The ancients made a wrong use of [John 10:30] to prove that Christ is . . . of the same essence with the Father." -Commentary on the Gospel According to John, by John Calvin Again we agree with Calvin. John 10:30 cannot be used to prove 4th century Catholic...