Search results

What are you talking about?

This sums up your theology - one-liners and avoidance.

Do not receive anything he hurls at you. He is frustrated because he cannot counteract the truth.

What is partially blind? Is that one eye can see and the other cannot?

You actually believe there are Christian nations today that have replaced natural Israel. This slur of Replacement Theology that you love to hurl at Amils to incite them is therefore complete duplicity. You are the one who holds to Replacement Theology. Here are your views: Who are the...

More lies!

No. You avoid. You have to. The reader can see for themselves. That is where Premil has arrived online. They are on the back-foot. They are on the run. The battle has been well won. The debating is over.

You are so stubborn in your nonsense. It is pointless engaging with you. You are also a hypocrite. You are the biggest proponent of this. This is all projection.

You have been pushing this nationalistic theocratic Christian nations replacement theology error for years without any biblical support. Many have challenged you but you refuse to change. The reality is: the Gospel was given to a spiritual organism – the Church – to bring to a lost world of...

Instead of your ad hominem, and lies, tell the reader, are these your quotes? Do these represent what you believe and have loudly taught or not? Yes or no? Stop smoke-screeni

He just waffles and wings it. There's no biblical substance to his arguments. It is all in his head. The problem is: he keeps forgetting the nonsense he previously promoted. One post contradicts another. I learned as a police officer for 15 years, it takes a good memory to be a liar. Ask a...

Are these your quotes? Do these represent what you believe and have loudly taught or not? Yes or no? Stop smoke-screening this. Stop misleading people.

You come out with wild claims, but are unable to substantiate them. When asked simple questions you cannot reply. When your views are refuted you are incapable of rebutting the counter-argument. Your MO is to simply voice your opinions (or what you have been taught). Arguing that the cross was...

You have nothing of historic or biblical weight to bring to the table. That is why you avoid simple questions. You are wasting our time.

Readers: I do not want anyone to be confused or misled by Randy K. He actually believes there are Christian nations today that have replaced natural Israel. This slur of Replacement Theology that he loves to hurl at Amils to incite them is therefore complete duplicity. He is the one who holds...

I showed you otherwise, and you have carefully ducked around it. You have to!

This is theological double-speak. You make it up as you go with your invented theology. No biblical quotes, no biblical language, just made up private reasoning you have been misled with. Talk about eisegesis!

More avoidance. You cannot abide the Word. Your argument revolves around your extra-biblical opinions. That is what your posts are full of.

Yaa-de-dah-de-daa! Nothing to bring to the table but avoidance and insults. This is the online Premill MO.

Really? Where does it teach that in Rev 20? It seems like you have made a habit of forcing what you have been taught on the sacred text.