Search results

One national emergency and disaster can change that overnight.

Half of your post is nonsense. Cut away the rumours and lies and i will take more notice of you. There is nothing wrong with worshipping on a Sunday. Or doing missionary work. Worshipping on Sunday is not the mark of the beast, or else we would all be guilty. Isuggest you revise your...

And you have every right to believe that, so long as your belief is founded on truth. Saying any denomination is dodgy or heretical or borderline Christian is real easy. Actually studying adventist doctrine and spending genuine time with prayer and dedicated time (the means by which they were...

I wouldn't be a Seventh Day Adventist for the past 28 years of i thought there was a better alternative. Not saying my church is perfect, far from it. But as far as biblical teaching is concerned, for me is the closest..

It is what the scriptures reveal, and the beast itself boasts that Sunday sacredness is a mark of her authority in that she has the power to establish feast days and sacred days in the place of God's anointed day. There's a chain of scripture that leads one to the inevitable concision that...

You are very naive if you believe a future Sunday law will not have as an adjunct an eventual law that forbids Sabbath observance. Otherwise the entire reason for the promotion of Sunday becomes invalidated, and the motives behind the legislation void. A dominant global Catholic Church will...

Paul is playing with words? “28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of...

Circumcision is still binding on Christians. Both make and female! Because circumcision is no longer physical, but of the heart.

Can I modify the above somewhat, as I think the way I've presented it may offer a wrong impression. When I speak of a union of church and state, I am basing the concept solely on prophecy. In Revelation we are shown a vision of a woman riding a beast. Babylon the Great, the Mother of...

Name me one person on this planet who understands the trinity. No discomfort at all. God has chosen not to explain the Godhead, nor define it. It's clearly His business and not ours. And I'm not prepared to make supposition or presumptions. It is what it is.

Yep, he was one of the good guys. Have you seen the Web site that Melody has been administering? Saw it several years ago, really interesting. Not sure how to get back to it.

Modern Jewish religion follow the Talmud. It's a written blasphemous exposition of hate.

Yes. The only second coming. There is no "prior to the second coming" another coming that is secret and takes Christians away from their greatest challenge.

“11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. 12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed...

I reject the premise that there are two second comings of Christ. The one you quoted, that's the only one. Same time as the resurrection. After the plagues. After the mark is enforced. After America pays homage to the Catholic papacy by forming the image. A political religious union of...

"Your house (not My house or God's house), but your house (the Jews' house) has been left unto you desolate. " God's house is a spiritual house and is the abode of the spirit of God. "Build Me a house that I may dwell among them". And that is what God has done.

And God would accept that despite the Jews hatred for the only Way, the only Truth, and the only Life?

My eschatology doesn't include a third temple. Whether it's built or not won't matter. The Temple of God that Paul references within which the Antichrist sits pretending to be God (claiming prerogatives and authority belonging only to Him) has been under construction since the time of Christ...

On what grounds would God accept it?

I have no problem with that at all. My problem is with those who claim there should be no separation, and are even now forming a union in order to "Christianise" America through legislation. I see great dangers in that not just for those whose Christian principles don't align with the "common...