Search results

Not necessarily. Hebrews 10:26, there is no sacrifice that covers this sin, suggests a lose of both. Otherwise, what is the purpose of the verse? Beyond that, salvation is contextual. I was saved from being in a life raft only to be hit by a car. The act of being saved from one life ending...

Isn't it funny that he then turns it around and blames US for going to her AS IF that remotely resembles reality? The gas lighting is over the top.

I already did. BTW, you do this a lot. You ask me to show you something I just did. They also would not recognize such over-spiritualized Christians from Scripture. Yes, and I've stated the reason many, MANY times. I admit there are spiritual verses, the overly spiritualized deny the soulful...

This is an error that we were all taught. How you know lying is different than false witness is Proverbs 6:16-19 16 There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him: 17 haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, 18 a...

With a name like "Barbarian," you know he's not a born again Christian.

Agh huh. Yet, alarmism has no equivalent list of scientists who signed a doc that the science shows we got 10 years left.

Nope. Mine was a list of 31,000 scientists who reject the alarmism of global warming. Not a political poll of the electorate.

I oppose the greatest hoax in human history, manmade global warming first. (COVID, a close 2nd).

Wrong. I have no such "need." Need is the language of communism. It is not a problem. Even if 100% of alarmists claims were true, I would still totally oppose what you propose we do about this "problem." Some generation of humans has to be the last one and I hope they die free.

Projecting. You cannot even acknowledge the morality that less extreme weather is better or humanity OR the set of facts I pasted in post 30.

Polling is political. @Armour of God, see how he changes from science to politics? His very first post invoked “real” climatologists. Now, he cedes the science ground to invoke polling. And even here, he fails in his Appeal to Authority. The poll that matters is elections. The electorate...

I said all life seeks to improve their situation. You deny even this.

That is where you are wrong as I’ve already stated and proven multiple times. Yours is not science but religion. You embrace the MAN IS BAD mantra at all costs.

And the watermelons will still be saying it's MAN'S FAULT. There is no guilt in striving to live in prosperity rather than poverty. The goal of all life is to improve their circumstances.

No comment on the Oregon Petition (renamed Global Warming Petition Project). 31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs, reject your nonsense. And so do I. Thank God the common man can vote and not just scientists you approve!

Still not getting it. CO2 is a trace gas, negligible. Doubling it is still negligible parts per million. In understanding planetary temperature of our neighbors, you CONFESSED CO2 is not the only cause of planetary temperature. And even worse, you have cause and effect backwards. Temperature...

I have seen with my own eyes for years more moderate weather and I saw that it was good. Genesis 1:4 And God saw that the light was good. Then he separated the light from the darkness. LOL Still can't admit the moral point. Less extreme weather is good for humanity.

From an all-time low as the 400 M graph shows. GHG effects are not merely about wavelength absorption but mass. 1 gigaton of water + 1 CO2 molecule does not measurably go up in planetary temperature when 1 more CO2 molecule is added to the atmosphere. Confession. There are more causal agents...

Repeat. See OP. @Armour of God, see what I mean about being schizophrenic about how wearier not being climate? In above post, he implies equality.

Peat And repeat.