Search results

Don't know WHY you keep repeating this stupid claim. The Greek text is totally irrelevant in determining WHO the "Rock" is. The answer lies in the Aramaic - NOT the Greek. Why do you thin k Paul refers to Peter as "Cephas" in his letters, Einstein? Cephas is a Greek transliteration of the...

WRONG, my woefully-ignorant friend . . . From the SAME century, we read the following excerpt from the document, “Martyrdom of Polycarp”. Polycarp was a contemporary and friend of Ignatius of Antioch: Excerpt from The Martyrdom of Polycarp: “When finally he concluded his prayer, after...

Actually- that's a LIE. You place ALL of your trust in Protestant teaching. The minute you accept false Protestant doctrines like Scripture Alone or Faith Alone or Eternal Security - you have trusted in those false doctrines for your very salvation. You have completely IGNORED Rev. 21:9-27...

So, you obviously didn’t actually READ the evidence I presented. The fact that the text is written in Greek is irrelevant. Greek was merely the lingua franca of commerce and communication between cultures in the first century. THAT’S why they wrote the NT in Greek. However – they SPOKE Aramaic...

With regard to Mary’s Immaculate Conception – We read about that in Luke 1:28. Luke 1:28 And he came to her and said, “Greetings, O favored one, the Lord is with you! The Greek text is very different – and more difficult to translate into one word. The Angel didn’t say, “Greetings, O favored...

I’ll take these ONE at a time . . . With regard to Peter being the “Rock” of Matt. 16:18 – I presented a list of respected and eminent PROTESTANT scholarship on the matter. Protestant Scholars on Matt. 16:16-19 1. There is no distinction between "petros" and "petra." "In Aramaic 'Peter' and...

WRONG. The ONE Church is ONE (John 17:20-23). It is a visible entity - "a city on a hill that cannot be hidden" (Matt. 5:14). One of the MAIN reasons for the Protestant Revolt was to separate from the Church. Mission accomplished . . . He and His Church are ONE (Acts 9:4-5, Col. 1:18, 1 Cor...

WRONG- and I already corrected you on that point. Bellarmine only attributed the TITLES of Jesus with regard to His Authority over the Church. EPIC FAIL . . .

Sure it is. Here is a FIRST CENTURY witness to prove my point: Ignatius of Antioch (Lifelong student of the Apoetle John) Follow your bishop, every one of you, as obediently as Jesus Christ followed the Father. Obey your clergy too as you would the apostles; give your deacons the same reverence...

YOU keep telling me that you have "poked plenty of holes" in these doctrines. I have addressed EACH on - and I will repeat the explanation for EACH on. But I'm STILL waiting read about the "holes" that YOU claim you poked in them.

I an MORE than happy to answer your questions - AFTER YOU answer just ONE of mine. You keep playing this game where you changed the topic or ask new questions without addressing the ones I have asked of YOU for several days now. Please answer the question I have asked you FIVETIMES now: Can...

WRONG. We CAN know who is ini His Church – and NOT all of them are on the narrow path. The Wheat exist right along with the Weeds (Matt. 13:24–43). His Church has good teachers and false teachers. He WARNED about this in Matt. 7:14-19. Being a member of His Church is NOT a guarantee of...

Another LIE . . . I never said that your 39-Book OT Canon was “False”., I said it is INCOMPLETE. It is missing 7 other Books as well as portions of Daniel and Esther. That’s NOT what I asked you. I asked you to explain WHY you adhere to the 39-Book OT Canon that was declared by a FALSE...

You haven’t showed me a SINGLE example of “blasphemy”. If you spent less time on the “guffaws” and mor time actually READING the entire quotes you post instead of cherry-picking them – you might actually have a semi-intelligent post. EPIC FAIL . . .

I’ve given Biblical answers for ALL of those doctrine. YOU said that you "poked plenty of holes" in them. Care to show me WHICJ doctrine you did that to??

PRECISELY. And neither are the paintings and statues in a Catholic Church. They are REMINDERS – just like the Golden Cherubim on top of the Ark that Moses made of the Giant statues of Angels that Solomon placed in the Temple.

In post #8310 - I responded to your Bellarmine nonsense and showed you how you took his quotes out of context. Anyway - this isn't a doctrinal matter. I repeatedly-challenged you afterward to explain why you adhere too the 39-Book OT Canon that was declared by a FALSE Prophet (Rabbi Akiba ben...

Now THAT'S hilarious . . . Would you mind pointing me to a SINGLE post where you "poked plenty of holes" in a Catholic doctrine? Yeah - that's what I thought, Einstein . . .

No – unless YOU mean something very different by “Church”. Scripture does NOT support the idea iof an “invisible” church. Over and over we are told how it is a visible entity (Matt. 5:15) with members that NEED each other (1 Cor. 12:1-31). There are first of all apostles, second prophets...

TRANSLATION: "I don't have a thought in my head - so I'll poke at you typos . . ." Good job, Einstein . . .