Search results

There is no stupidity that exceeds yours. Reformation Protestantism was preeminent for 200 years after the end of the Reformation, which liberated the true Church from your spiritual tyranny, darkness, and oppression. But what would a duped blinded papist like yourself know about that?

Hebrews 10:9

Might as well save your keystrokes and bytes. I don't decrypt gibberish.

What are you doing here? Hebrews 10:9 is still awaiting the answers that you reneged on.

Provide a list of verbatim quotes by Reformation Protestants who claim that Clarke is "outdated". Nothing compared to the repetitive debacles of sexual abomination within your "church".

Not in my Bible. What version are you reading from?

Of course it doesn't refer to Peter, because he was not the Petra Rock. Christ is. Thanks for agreeing with me. Adam Clarke Peter, πετρος, signifies a stone, or fragment of a rock; and our Lord, whose constant custom it was to rise to heavenly things through the medium of earthly, takes...

I appreciate your understanding of 12. In context it can also represent faithfulness, as in the understanding of the identity of the 144,000 in Revelation. The Church and the 144,000 Revelation 7:3-4 describe the 144,000 as “sealed.” That description is reserved in the NT for believers in...

True. In fact all of the "he's" in Daniel 9:27 refer back to the "prince" in Daniel 9:26. And the "prince" in Daniel 9:26 refers back to "Messiah the Prince" in Daniel 9:25. There is only one individual identified as a prince in the passage. That is Messiah the Prince.

"Using Petros to translate Kepha was done simply to reflect the masculine noun of Peter." "Christ" is a masculine noun. But He is described as the feminine "Petra", the Rock. (1 Corinthians 10:4) There is therefore no reason that the masculine "Peter" could not also have been described as...

I've seen far more than enough papist gibberish and nonsense. Go peddle it elsewhere.

From your previous post: ``“Kephs”, which is what Jesus called him.`` You have no idea what you`re talking about. Go back to the monastery.

In what manuscript did Jesus call him “Kephs”?

Interesting question. I wouldn't consider them to have fallen until 70 AD, as I'm certain that if they had turned to Christ in the intervening 30-some years, they would have been shown mercy. All of the Christians in Jerusalem and Judea were shown mercy, as Jesus warned them to flee prior to...

God actually permitted more than 30 years, as the destruction of Jerusalem and Judea did not occur until 70 AD.

Thanks. I'll reply in installments. Jeff and rwb, feel free to contribute. 30 AD, Christ "cut off" (crucifixion/death) middle of 70th week (of Daniel)

vonit din't earloier or an More papist gibberish. Your dictonary still isn't working. Why can't you answer this question?: Why did Jesus refer to Peter as "Petros" and not "Cephas"???

Thanks for the guffaw. The earliest extant manuscript of Matthew is in Greek, not Aramaic. And it renders Matthew 16:18 as "Petros/Petra". "Public liturgy" is irrelevant. If Codex Vaticanus is not legitimate, what is it doing in the Vatican library?

You're incapable of understanding the "naos" spiritual temple, or the papacy which has occupied it for over 1,000 years. Simple as that.

Thanks. I'm waiting for our friend Robert to keep his side of the agreement. He seems to be having difficulty.