Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    23 major reasons to reject the Premil doctrine!

    Dispensationalism's "God at His Word" contorts Christ into antichrist. It is the abomination of desecration.
  2. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    Two simple questions. Here they are again: Does the master live for ever? Does the servant live for ever? Just yes or no. That's all that's necessary.
  3. C

    New Covenant only for Jews?

    Sooooo, WHY didn't the authors of Codex Vaticanus render Matthew 16:18 the same way as you claim it was in oral Aramaic? That is, petra/petra, as you claim it was. Not petros/petra, as they rendered it. Sooooo, WHY??? Because they understood the distinction, and the Greek in which they wrote...
  4. C

    Another simple disproof of Amil: No more sea

    You are absolutely correct. So in deciding if Genesis 3:15 is a spiritual or a literal prophecy, what would you say? The answer is self-evident.
  5. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    You've said you're not afraid to answer. Two simple questions. Do you need help?
  6. C

    New Covenant only for Jews?

    The delusional ranting, raving, shrieking, and screaming of apostate papistry. Thank God for the Reformation. You'd better exhume the authors of your Greek Codex Vaticanus and excoriate them for daring to understand the difference between petros and petra. And you'd better immediately remove...
  7. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    Does the master live for ever? Does the servant live for ever? "In other words. it can not be broken or revoked." Those are your words, not Scripture's. Next time you should refrain from imposing your malinterpretations on the Word.
  8. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    Exodus 21:6 Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever. When does "for ever" end in Exodus 21:6? "If you can't answer. just say so."
  9. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    Exodus 21:6 Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever.
  10. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    You'll notice that Deuteronomy follows Genesis, thus represents God's last Word on the land, and that Word was, entirely unsurprisingly, contingent upon faith and obedience. Hebrews 1 1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in...
  11. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    When did God relinquish His right to demand faith and obedience as the conditions of His promises? Deuteronomy 30:17-18 (KJV) – “But if thine heart turn away, so that thou wilt not hear, but shalt be drawn away, and worship other gods, and serve them; I denounce unto you this day, that ye shall...
  12. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    I'm not sure I understand your response, so let me simplify the question. Did Christ completely fulfill Daniel 9:24 at Calvary?
  13. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    When did Israel steal the land from God?
  14. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    Leviticus 25 23 The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine, for ye are strangers and sojourners with me. God, not Israel, owns the land. Hebrews 1 1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these last days...
  15. C

    New Covenant only for Jews?

    I have no idea what you're babbling about. Neither do you. Do both petros and petra appear in Matthew 16:18 in your Codex Vaticanus?
  16. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    Were Daniel 9:24 and Matthew 26:28 Finished Works at the Cross?
  17. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    You just can't believe that God would actually completely fulfill one of His promises instead of delaying it into your fantasized falsified future, can you. Are you also one of those who deny that Christ completely established His New Covenant at Calvary in total fulfillment of Daniel 9:24...
  18. C

    New Covenant only for Jews?

    Thank God for the Reformation, which liberated His True Church from the heresies and blasphemies of the apostate papacy. From your Codex Vaticanus: Matt 16:18 [Codex Vaticanus Gr. 1209 (B03) (4th century)]14ac1 Καγω δε σοι λεγω οτι συ ει πετρος και επι ταυτη τη πετρα οικοδομησω μου την...
  19. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    Fulfilled long ago. Joshua 21 43 And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein. 44 And the Lord gave them rest round about, according to all that he sware unto their fathers: and there stood not a man of all their...
  20. C

    Why Old Eschatologies Should Be Updated

    I don't see the words "gifts" or "calling" in the verses you quoted. Do you? Or are the verses with the words "gifts" and "calling" redacted in your bible?