Search results

There is NO such thing as "Catholic truth". Truth is objective and does not require an adjective. As for statues and images - they are NOT condemned, Einstein. God forbade the WORSHIP if images, making them IDOLS. He commanded Moses to make 2 Golden Cherubim to place atop the Ark (Exod...

No - it has been this was for a LONG time. Perhaps YOU were confirmed in a different Liturgical Rite - Byzantine? Maronite?

And this has absolutely NOTHING to do with the fact that YOU claim that if it's not in the Bible - it's NOT true. This is a Scripturally-Bankrupt statement.

I ALSO stated that this was the case for the Latin/Toman Rite. It is done at earlier ages in the Eastern Eites.

First of all - WHAT did I say?? I said confirmation does not USUALLY take place until the adolescent years (14-16). YOU falsely said that it "TYPICALLY" occurs at 7 or 8 years of age. Pay attention . . .

This is proof that you don't read the Bible that you claim to rely on for ALL of your truth. The Jews depended on TWO pillars of revelation in the OT: The WRITTEN Word of God (Scripture) The ORAL Word of God (Tradition) This didn't "magically change" in the NT. It is precisely WHY Paul tells...

YOUR problem is that you speak matter-of-factly about things you have NO knowledge of. This applies especially to your remarks with regard to Catholicism. I am a Latin Rite (Roma) Catholic. In this Rite - confirmation does NOT usually take place until the adolescent years (14-16) - nor 7 or 8...

And this is a TEXTBOOK example of the bankrupt, 16th century, man-made invention of Sola Scriptura. The idea that - if it ain't in the Bible- then it ain't true . . . There mere fact that not every wedding ceremony is documented in Scripture us somehow "proof" that they didn't happen is perfect...

I ask YOU for Biblical evidence for your claim that automatically make you their spouse - and ALL you can respond with is, "Read the Bible" and "You should find that"?? SERIOUSLY?? That's your proof??

That won't stop me from exposing your nonsense. PS - "LOL" . . .

So, YOUR contention is whoever you have sex with becomes your de facto spouse?? Show me the Biblical evidence for this. Chapter and Verse, please . . .

Those verses condemn sex outside of marriage. Only a moral relativist like yourself would try to wiggle out of that truth.

I SUNK your argument in post #1320. Just like I destroyed your argument that people cannot be holy - when the Bible says we absolutely CAN (1 Pet. 2:9, 1 Peter 1:16, 1 Peter 1:15, Heb. 12:14).

I ALREADY have . . .

A THOUSAND angry denials doesn't amount to ONE fact . . .

And there is nothing “deceptive” about the word “Fornication”. We ALL know what it means . . .

Your entire argument that the Bible endorses sex outside of wedlock is nothing more than deflection. You have posted paragraph after paragraph of gobbledygook that is nothing more than a non-existent rabbit-hole of your OWN imagination. “Fornication” is a word that describes a very REAL...

Hey – just an honest observation . . .

Once again, you are blind to the difference between EXPLICIT Biblical teaching and IMPLICIT Biblical teaching. ALL THREEE of the verses I gave you are implicit in their condemnation of sex outside of wedlock. The following are also implicit, almost explicit teachings on fornication: 1 Cor. 7:2...

Soooo, exposing YOUR lies is an “Anti-Protestant” attack?? You’re implying that Protestants are liars?? Interesting . . .