Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. T

    If I have Offended Anyone Here

    While just posting facts, I have been acussed of offending others. I apologized to them. Some people don't like the facts.
  2. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    I already explained it, why repeat your post as if I did not answer?
  3. T

    How does one evaluate a testimony?

    When Jesus uses me to convert one to him. I have them call a fellow Christian to share their testimony. But, when a testimony is unreal, outragious, we must evaluate it honestly. Especially if it published in a book format. I am not talking about the everyday praise report.
  4. T

    How does one evaluate a testimony?

    There have been Christian Celebrities, whoose testimonies have been proved as false, a fraud. Thus it is neccesary for us to learn how to test stories. I agree, with the average Christian looking for the fruit and II Peter 1 in our life applies. But, when a testimony is weird, it needs to be...
  5. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Someone asked why JW's are unable to accept truth and answer simple questions. I am only posting the well known facts. Also, I have answered their views with well known learned Scholars of Church History, Biblical Languages and so on. Please read them, thank Bro.
  6. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    No one is saying there are two gods. Humans have Human Children.
  7. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Articles... The Text and Grammar of John 1:18 Dan Wallace The One and Only Son Richard Longenecker Blogs... John 1:18 in the Sahidic Coptic Translation
  8. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    monogenhV qeoV Ò wn ton kolpon tou patroV ekeinoV exhghsato MONOGENÊS THEOS hO ÔN TON KOLPON TOU PATROS EKEINOS EXÊGÊSATO [The} one and only God who is in the bosom of the father, [he] has explained [Him]. MONOGENÊS
  9. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    McReynolds and Harris make the same point.4 Had John wished to use monogenês unambiguously as an adjective, he could have written ho theos ho monogenês. He could also have made the adjectival force far more likely by writing ho monogenês theos. Instead, he wrote simply monogenês theos, using...
  10. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Translating Monogenês There are two significant difficulties the translator must resolve when rendering monogenês in English: What does the word mean and does it function as an adjective or as a noun? The first difficulty is complicated by a long tradition of translating monogenês as...
  11. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Only Son or Only God? The initial problem is a textual one. Of the thousands of early Greek New Testament manuscripts, there are four principal textual variants of this phrase. We first need to establish which variant we believe represents the original text, then move from there into possible...
  12. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Thayer's Greek Lexicon STRONGS NT 3439: μονογενής μονογενής, μονογενές (μόνος and γένος) (Cicero,unigena; Vulg. (in Lukeunicus, elsewhere) and in ecclesiastical writingsunigenitus), single of its kind, only (A. V. only-begotten); used of only sons or daughters (viewed in relation to their...
  13. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Was Jesus “Begotten” or "Unique"? (John 3:16) GREEKPROF “Begotten” is the KJV translation of μονογενής in John 3:16. It describes the unique relationship of Jesus to the Father. However, the KJV “begotten” is based on a misunderstanding of how the word was formed. μόνος conveys the idea of...
  14. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Acts 13 Easy-to-Read Version Barnabas and Saul Given a Special Work 13 In the church at Antioch there were some prophets and teachers. They were Barnabas, Simeon (also called Niger), Lucius (from the city of Cyrene), Manaen (who had grown up with King Herod[a]), and Saul. 2 These men were all...
  15. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Psalm 2 Easy-to-Read Version 2 Why are the nations so angry? Why are the people making such foolish plans? 2 Their kings and leaders join together to fight against the Lord and his chosen king.[a] 3 They say, “Let’s rebel against them. Let’s break free from them!” 4 But the one...
  16. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Articles The New World Translation and John 1:1: What the Scholars Really Said Robert Hommel Jesus as "a god" Alongside God: JWs and John 1:1 Sam Shamoun Theos is a Count Noun: Is the Word "God" or "a god" in John 1:1c Robert Hommel Qualitative Nouns: Emphasis or Sense? Robert...
  17. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Conclusion While the scholars we have considered have some differences with regard to the applicability of Colwell's Rule to John 1:1c and the particular semantic force of THEOS in this clause, they are unanimous in regarding the proper understanding of John's meaning: The Word has all the...
  18. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Daniel B. Wallace In his intermediate Greek grammar, Wallace accepts Harner's definition of the qualitative semantic force, and provides a number of examples outside of John 1:1. Wallace, like Harner, advocates qualitativeness as a separate semantic category, either coexisting alongside...
  19. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    Paul Dixon Dixon's study is the first of several to challenge the popular application of Colwell's rule. Dixon notes that Colwell's data begins with definite PNs and demonstrates that these usually lack the article. However, those using the rule to "prove" that THEOS in John 1:1c is definite...
  20. T

    A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

    So, Harner, in agreement with Robertson, Dana & Mantey, and most other scholars cited above, notes that if both THEOS and LOGOS were articular, the two terms would be convertible. Since John did not use this syntax, his intended meaning must be something else. Harner continues: Thus, Harner...