Search results

This shows how bereft you are of any credible biblical support. This teaches nothing about your imaginary corrupt future millennium. 1. Where in Matthew 19:28, or anywhere else in Scripture, do you consider definitely corroborate the Premillennial interpretation of Revelation 20 that there are...

This is where premillennialism online has arrived. It has lost the theological debate. Now it is trying to philosophize.

LOL. More noise! No evidence. That is all you have now. How about addressing all the Ops you avoid that expose Premil?

It is all noise bro!

LOL. Don't even talk to us about supporting Scripture with Scripture. You have absolutely nothing to support your opinions of Revelation 20. Nothing, zero, nada! You do not know what biblical corroboration looks like.

Q. Why must we “remember Lot's wife”? What befell her? She got caught in the escape out of Sodom because her heart was still there. Despite being fully aware of the impending destruction, Lot's wife’s heart was located in Sodom and towards the awful iniquity; this was despite the fact that she...

More noise. The JWs share your beliefs and flawed mode of hermeneutics.

Where do any of the ancient Chiliasts before AD 270 teach the Premil belief of Satan being cast down from heaven at the second coming? Where do any of the ancient Chiliasts before AD 270 teach the Premil belief of the binding of Satan at the second coming? Where do any of the ancient Chiliasts...

Yes, LOL. That could have been "diva Debbie" for short. It read diva D to most of us.

LOL. This is all noise. It is hard to take you serious. Your MO is avoidance - hit and run. The only thing that you have to debunked over this past number of years is your ability to present a strong, biblical and cohesive argument. I cannot remember the last discussion you carried to its...

No problem David. I think you used to go under the name Divad.

Where do any of the ancient Chiliasts before AD 270 teach the Premil belief of Satan being cast down from heaven at the second coming? Where do any of the ancient Chiliasts before AD 270 teach the Premil belief of the binding of Satan at the second coming? Where do any of the ancient Chiliasts...

He cannot address God's Word and he cannot even explain Scripture. He just relays what he has been taught.

How many Amil threads does that happen on? They have no answer. Diva knows he has nothing. That is why he hits and runs.

The Chiliast ECFs were all over the place. They do not reference Rev 20. I think only one of them does that I remember. But not to preach Premil, but Chiliasm.

He already did that 2000 years ago. But you cannot see that. Read what the Word of God teachers about the binding of Satan. Matthew 12:22-29, Mark 3:11, 23-27, Luke 10:18-19, Luke 11:20-22, John 12:31-33 Colossians 2:13-15, Hebrews 2:14-15, I John 3:8, Revelation 9:1-11, Revelation 12:7-9 and...

We all know this. And what is your point? The most striking moment in Revelation 19 is the fact that he destroys all the wicked. There is none survive. That immediately destroys your whole doctrine. All flesh is destroyed. There is no wicked left to overrun the new earth (as in Premil)...

Here we go again. Silence from Diva and all his fellow Premils when a simple rebuttal is given to their error. This is now the pattern. There's not even a challenge anymore. This is a sure sign that the battle has been long-won. Every speculation is easily refuted.

They did. See above.

The unbelieving Jews believed in a future millennium, but it was not one where Satan was able to overrun it at the end. This probably colored early Chiliasts. Although, not surprisingly, none of the early Chiliasts believed in the rebuilding of the temple, the return of blood sacrifices, or none...