Search results

All of this: What book or man taught you these sayings?

@marks what book(s) did you read that put this philosophy in your head? Respectfully.

It is a biblical principle that can be used as an example for other points of contention. You don’t get it. As for the rest of your very long post, shorten it up. I got better things to read like my King James Bible than all of that hot air.

Apostle Paul: “…O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?” (Acts 13:10) Jesus Christ: “Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?” (Matthew...

Perhaps to prove a point to Satan?

“One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.” (Romans 14:5) “…keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:” (1 Timothy 6:20)...

Yes. And the errors are in the MODERN critical text based Bibles! They are missing scriptures that scribes omitted. “I have more understanding than all my teachers: for thy testimonies are my meditation.” (Psalms 119:99) What do you meditate on that spiritual things are nonsense to you? Or...

I researched this matter years ago. You are just repeating the propaganda of modern scholars. I heard it all before, “scribes added yada yada yada…” It’s just speculation. Not factual evidence. My spiritual discernment tells me that scribes left out scriptures (either intentionally...

And variations in wording that do not change doctrine are of no concern as I already stated. Well, you gave a good example in the quote below: “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” (Romans 8:1) The...

A variation in wording teaching the same principle doctrine is much different from deleting and altering words that do change principle doctrines (the modern Bibles are guilty of the latter).

I’m just entertaining myself with this conversation at this point @Jim B Practicing my sword wielding.

The spiritual train of believers does indeed appear to have left this station in life with little to no one left to replace them. Reading the Bible is eating spiritual food. The King James Bible is rich in nutrients and flavor; a complete, full course, spiritual meal. The modern Bibles are...

Read my post without assuming things. All believers who are born again of incorruptible seed have spiritual discernment. You don’t seem to have it because of the faulty modern Bible(s) you been feeding on. Get the pure milk of the word perfectly preserved in the King James Bible! “Being born...

Come now, are you just messing with me? “We” believers do have the Spirit of Christ/God: “But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. And if Christ be in you, the body is dead...

No. It’s based on spiritual discernment. “But he that is spiritual judgeth all things” (1 Corinthians 2:15) I therefore, as a spiritually minded believer, judge that the King James Bible is still the King of all translations since it’s release! And don’t deny that I am spiritual: “…ye which...

“…and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.” (1 Corinthians 7:40) Which translates to “we” as believers. We have the Spirit of Christ. I have it too! I have the mind of Christ because Paul said “we” as believers have it.

My faulty mind no longer rules me. I now have the mind of Christ. “…we have the mind of Christ.” (1 Corinthians 2:16) Go get it, it’s free for the taking. Just have faith!

Well, It's people like yourself that make outlandish and untrue claims that the KJV is the only translation filled with additions and errors that irk me!

Um, perfect is a synonym for excellent.

Standardization of spelling and grammar changes nothing. It’s just visual stuff. Why does the KJV anger you so much? It’s quite irrational.