Search results

Revelation 20 says: "he should deceive the nations [Gr. ethnos or Gentiles] no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season." Deceiving the nations no more is talking about the enlightenment of the Gentiles 2000 years ago. The word...

More avoidance of my simple questions. Typical. You have to. They expose your error.

And?

Oh, so your 1st resurrection is now the resurrection of the wicked dead 1000 years+ after the second coming? Wow! All because you are relying on AI. Sad! I knew this day was coming. Who needs the Holy Spirit any more when Diva has AI?

Do you believe Satan and his minions are physical beings? Is the dragon in Revelation 20:2 a literal physical dragon? Is the serpent in Revelation 20:2 a literal physical serpent? Is the key mentioned in Revelation 20:1 a literal metal door key? Is the chain mentioned in Revelation 20:1 a...

Firstly, repeated Scripture uses binding in a figurative sense. The wicked are depicted as being in chains and in a prison before salvation. We all know that that is not literal. No one would suggest with any justification that they are incapable of movement or harm on this earth. Secondly...

All false accusations and zero biblical evidence. That sums up your posts and position.

You are full of noise. Show your evidence, if you have it. The reality is: you have nothing.

You are not refuting anything here, just promoting your own theory. What words did I place out of order or change the meaning of? You are still to show.

The reader can see you have no rebuttal. You are incapable of laying a punch on Amil. If there were any holes in Amil you would give them.

LOL. More unsubstantiated noise. What are your arguments? I have seen none so far. The time for producing is finally here. Present your evidence, if you have it. All you do is make statements. That is the sum-total of your position. I suspect you have nothing, that is why you have nothing to...

What are you talking about? Can you even present a coherent argument? It seems not. Make your point - one at a time.

Yaa-de-dah-de-dah!

What about Satan' being bound? Put evidence on the table instead of your continual false charges.

Explain. This is typical of Premils. They have zero evidence to back up their claims. All they have is personal opinions. This amounts to nothing.

LOL. How about identifying one hole in Amil that we can address? You cannot address any of the many holes we present on this forum. The Premil silence is deafening. All we are getting is broad sweeping unsubstantiated statements.

Isaiah 65:19 says, the voice of weeping shall be (Lo') no more heard in her, nor the voice of crying.” Once again, we come across the word Lo' in this text. This time we learn that there will be no more “weeping”/“crying.” This is further grounds for believing this phrase in Isaiah 65:20...

Where is a future millennium mentioned in Isaiah 65:19-25? Nowhere! Premils force their beliefs into the sacred text where it does not belong. This is called eisegesis not exegesis. Text, context and co-text do not seem to matter to them. Whatever way you look at it, this demolishes Premil, as...

We should base our interpretation of Isaiah 65:17-25 on what is clearly taught in the Revelation 21 (the fuller revelation) about the new heavens and new earth. Isaiah 65:17 explains: “For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into...

Synonymous parallelism is found in Isaiah 65:17. • For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: • And the former shall not (לֹֽא־ or Lo') be remembered, nor (לֹֽא־ or Lo') come into mind. This is clearly telling us that the old corrupt temporal decaying arrangement is going to be...