Search results

Not who was capable of it. You didn't answer the question. Who brought in the everlasting righteousness of Daniel 9:24?

If someone rejects Christ, and gathers in community with those who reject Christ, will he or she be more likely, or less likely, to continue rejecting Christ? The answer is self-evident.

Gathering is for their mutual affirmation and encouragement. Integral to that is their rejection of Christ. Do you think that orthodox Jews do not attack Christianity? Do you think that their rejection of Christ is not bad and non-Christian?

When Jesus said in Mark 1:15 that the time was fulfilled, what time was He referring to?

Who brought in the everlasting righteousness of Daniel 9:24?

To be an orthodox Jew, you must reject Christ. That is an indispensable part of orthodox Jewish tradition. Multitudes believe that virtuous things will save them i.e. salvation by works. That blinds them to the reality that salvation is only by grace through faith.

Far worse than childish nonsense is the psychosis of interpretation by hallucination which sees apparitions that do not exist. Waiting for you to show us your hallucinatory appartition "antichrist". The antichrist that dispensational futurism has embraced from the counter-reformation of the...

They can be a good thing only if they lead to salvation in Christ. How can Jewish tradition lead to salvation in Christ, when Jewish tradition explicitly rejects Christ?

Who will be saved by Jewish tradition? Jesus' words about Jewish tradition. Matthew 15:3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition? Mark 7:8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of...

Christ's own claim of the fulfillment of the time was sufficient. Nothing requires the inclusion of 70AD in the 70 weeks. 70AD records the subsequent consequential events resulting from those within the 70 weeks. There is only one prophetic event that could satisfy the combined criteria of...

It's false if you disbelieve Mark 1:14-15. I happen to believe it. 2 Corinthians 5:21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. 1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to...

Apology accepted, thanks. Various of the ECFs did express anticipation for a restoration of Israel, but it was to be a spiritual restoration accomplished by God through the Church, not a geopolitical restoration. I'm not aware of anyone in pre-19th-century orthodox Christian history who...

The claimant bears the burden of proof. As expected, you can prove nothing, and your claim is null and void.

My assertions originate directly in the associated Scripture. Yours do not.

You're the one claiming the material exists. So back up your claim with hard evidence. Name, source, date, verbatim quote Specifically asserting that Romans 9:27 is about Israel's remnant's geopolitical salvation, not the salvation of her souls. Otherwise, your claim is null and void.

Mark 1 14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, 15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel. The time was the 70th week. Fulfilled in Christ, His Gospel, His...

Romans 11 26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. The Deliverer does not turn away Israel's enemies. He turns away...

What historic premil espoused your notion that Romans 9:27;11:26 are about Israeli geopolitics? Name, date, source, and verbatim quote; please.

Debunked previously both mathematically and empirically. We're all ethnically "Jewish People".

Colossians 1:13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: No hint of Israeli politics. Why are you unable to cite anyone from Church history who supports your perspective?