Search results

There are no punctuation marks in the original Hebrew Bible texts. Our understanding of Hebrew grammar and the context of the text determines where we place punctuation marks today.

I moved no words. It reads the way it reads in the original.

The basis of your argument is: So, where have I "moved words around to render Isaiah 65:20 differently" and where is my "rearrangement of the text"?

Support your claim or i will take it we are looking at another false allegation from you.

I am taking the Hebrew word for word. What words have I moved out of place, as you allege?

Show me one single Hebrew word that I have placed out of order? The burden of proof is with you. You made the claim.

This is your typical response. You are incapable of addressing the original and showing what is in error because you have nothing apart from own false teaching and heresy - denying the literal physical future coming of Christ. It is time to cough up or shut up.

Hebrews 12:18 supports this contention, saying, “For ye are not come [plural perfect active indicative] unto the mount that might be touched, and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and tempest.” Hebrews 12:22 says, “But ye are come [plural perfect active indicative] unto...

Again, it is time to move into the NT and let it interpret the OT. Jesus referred specifically to Psalm 118:22 when talking to the religious Jews of His day: “Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the...

The first resurrection is shown throughout the Word to be Christ’s resurrection. Acts 26:23 presents Christ’s physical resurrection as the first resurrection, saying, “Christ should suffer, and that He should be the first [Gr. protos] that should rise [Gr. anastasis] from the dead, and should...

Premils are often so obsessed with what Satan is doing and his evil that they miss what God is doing. None of the evil on the earth or the folly of man dilutes the sovereign authority of Christ ruling and reigning over all mankind. They can belittle the supreme authority of Christ all they wish...

Exactly bro! They are digging a hole for themselves.

The theme of the whole book of Zechariah concentrates totally upon the nature and happenings of the first coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. It prophetically looks forward (500 years before) with anticipation to that ‘day of the Lord’ when the incarnate Son of God would arrive on this scene of...

Psalm 2:1-12 tells us: “Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. He that...

Once again, more avoidance and more false charges. That sums up the Premil position on this forum. And you wonder why no one takes you serious? Could you please do a detailed comparison between Zechariah 14 and Revelation 20? I see no likeness. I will not hold my breath.

Premillennialism cannot abide biblical scrutiny. That is why Premils run when their beliefs are confronted. You cannot even answer simple questions. You have to duplicate everything to support your position. Talk about confusion.

Which NHNE is Satan's little season in? In your Mark 1 new heavens and new earth, is there sin and sinners? In your Mark 1 new heavens and new earth, is there dying and crying? In your Mark 1 new heavens and new earth, is there disease and decay? In your Mark 1 new heavens and new earth, is...

Are both of your NHNE figurative then? They are not real?

LOL. More avoidance. I wonder why?

Do you notice how Premils avoid these exposures like the plague, and simply resort to ad hominem or divert the thread away from the subject at hand, whereas Amils take head on every false accusations on Premils directly and refute their false charges against Amil. No wonder Premil is dying. We...