Search results

Yes Revelation 20:1-6 IS... about a future "thousand years" reign by Christ and His elect, AS WRITTEN. You are kicking against the pricks (cactus) like Saul by rejecting that Scripture and instead following men's old bottle traditions. Rev 20:1-6 20 And I saw an angel come down from heaven...

Yeah there will be a "thousand years" reign by Christ Jesus and His elect at His return. The Revelation 20 Chapter declares Jesus will reign a literal "thousand years" immediately after His future return. The Old Testament prophets point to it also (Zechariah 14:16-21; Isaiah 24:20-23; Psalms...

Oh no, you can't just jump to that Revelation 7:9 verse while bypassing the previous verses about God's Sealing of 12,000 out of each Israelite tribe mentioned. The "great multitude" is shown having come out of great tribulation, meaning they had to have been sealed by God's Seal also...

TOTALLY IRRELEVANT TO THE EZEKIEL 39 SCRIPTURE.

No, Daniel was blessed and shown prophecy about the END of this world with the false-Messiah coming to setup the "abomination of desolation". It's YOUR "determination" idea applied to the 70th week of Daniel 9 that is silly.

Well, I asked you in my last post. Why are you stalling? Is it because you don't know what that means regarding the 6th Seal?

No, Jesus was DEFINITELY NOT speaking of Himself as the "abomination of desolation". That idea you've picked up is straight from the devil. Antiochus did not 'completely' fulfill the "vile person" prophecy in Daniel 11 and Daniel 9:27, nor the "little horn" prophecy of Daniel 8:9-14, etc...

Oh good grief, the meaning behind the word for "captivity" in the Ezekiel 39 example FOLLOWS THE CONTEXT, so what is the context flow of those verses? What's the subject? THE RETURN OF THE CHILDREN ISRAEL BACK TO THE HOLY LAND IN FINAL BY GOD HIMSELF! How can anyone understand God's Word using...

I don't recall who I asked about the "untimely figs" regarding the 6th Seal. And I think my question was specific enough. I think you're just stalling. Rev 6:12-13 12 And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of...

The fig tree has two harvests because the one in the spring is about the winter fig. What did Jesus say symbolic harvest time for His coming would be per His parable of a fig tree? Not spring. This is so... easy!

Answering your questions are easy. But what about what I asked regarding the stars cast down like "untimely figs" mentioned on the 6th Seal? If you had actually paid attention... to what Jesus said about watching those Signs He gave in His Olivet discourse, then you'd have understood also gave...

You'll have to use your brain more than that instead of using such a silly idea as above. That ain't even logical enough to respond to. Ah... trying to categorize me into the Futurist/Dispensationalist crowd? There again, you show your ignorance, because the Premillennial idea existed long...

Scratch any idea that God's new heavens and a new earth begins on the "day of the Lord" when Lord Jesus returns. That is man's supposition. Before God's Eternity of a new heavens and a new earth will begin, Jesus must reign over the wicked, making them His footstool, for "one thousand" years...

No, it's not your system. It's not God's system written in those actual Bible Scriptures either. It's pure... speculation out on a limb. I'm surprised you got suckered into it.

They don't care to follow the actual written Scripture Truth, they instead are brainwashed by a doctrine from the followers of Ellen White.

Ignorance, I ain't got no time for dat! Welcome BACK... to my IGNORE LIST.

From The Companion Bible, a KJV study Bible compiled by the 19th century Bible scholar E.W. Bullinger, Appendix 91: Archbishop Ussher's Chronology was first added to the Authorized Version by Bishop Lloyd in the edition of 1701. But, in Nehemiah 2:1, Bishop Lloyd put his own date "445 B.C." ...

Your inapt use of men's doctrines instead of staying in the actual written Bible Scripture is noted.

No, I'm simply using common sense in the Bible Scriptures instead of straining at it like a gnat. The Bible scholar E.W. Bullinger had it on the nail, so here, why not argue with him a little while... https://www.companionbiblecondensed.com/AP/ap91/index.html?page=2

Still not completely accurate though, I must say. The idea that the two types of resurrections are separated by a thousand years is man's supposition based on the flesh. Most pastors today believe the "change" on the "last trump" that Apostle Paul taught in 1 Corinthians 15 is only for those in...