Search results

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance fullness, fulfilling, full Fulfilling of the acceptance of the Gentiles.

True, because it does not exist in historic Christian Church orthodoxy. Certainly. It's called the New Testament for a reason. Calvary occurred in the middle of the 70th week, the abomination of desolation occurred leading up to 70 AD, and the great tribulation occurred in the destruction...

Chris Gedge's epic "The Atonement Clock" has spelled out the chronology in exhaustive detail. Have you read it? The fulness of the Gentiles came in almost 2,000 years ago when the Gospel began to be taken to them. No Israelite has been blinded since that time. Each Israelite's blindness is...

The epitome of silly is dispensational futurism striving to manufacture a nonexistent antichrist breaking his nonexistent covenant in a decapitated 70th week. The Covenant and its Confirmation in the book of Daniel occur in Daniel 9:27. The are the epitome of existent, fulfilled at Calvary...

Since you can't find the covenant and its confirmation anywhere else in Daniel, you're marooned.

The week which lies after the 69th week is the 70th week, and the midst of the 70th week (Daniel 9:27) lies at 70 1/2 weeks. The 70th week began at the beginning of Jesus' ministry. Every Israelite who has accepted Christ and His New Covenant since He proclaimed it has been reborn and added...

The covenant and its confirmation appear in Daniel 9:27. Nowhere else in Daniel.

What doesn't make sense? In Christ's ministry, He confirmed His Everlasting Covenant through the Gospel in person with the many Israelites who accepted Him for 3 1/2 years until His death, then His disciples confirmed it in their ministries to the Israelites for the remaining 3 1/2 years, which...

The covenant and its confirmation appear in Daniel 9:27. Nowhere else in Daniel.

The same outfit that fabricated the counterfeit futurized antichrist embraced by dispensational delusionism.

More psychotic raving. I was wondering when you would be emerging. Were the historical defenders of Christian orthodoxy all false Jews? Scripture for that?

Awaiting those two magical words of hallucinatory dispensational psychosis. "Antichrist" and "break". Are you aware that 1 John was not written in ancient Hebrew?

Of course you don't care. Scriptural historical fulfillment is anathema to dispensational fallacy, for it exposes its deceptions and delusions.

There is no word for "antichrist" in ancient Hebrew, so there is nothing that a nonexistent antichrist can break. Just dispensational folly and fallacy.

What are you doing in Daniel 12? There is no covenant confirmed in that chapter. You could help yourself by focusing on the relevant Scripture in Daniel 9.

Yes, they were so popular that they were martyred by the multitude. Just like today's armchair dispensational deluded deniers.

Dispensational fallacy tells us that the AntiChrist will break one in the middle of seven years. The Bible doesn't. Waiting for you to show us those magical words "Antichrist" and "break". The ones that don't appear in any Bible.

Who is clueless? 1. All historical defenders of the true Christian faith over 17 centuries. 2. dad Real easy answer.

This is so risible that it doesn't warrant any response. However... Highlight "AC" and "breaks" in the passage for all of us.

The Covenant was initially with Israel. Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people... In Christ's ministry, He confirmed His Everlasting Covenant through the Gospel in person with the many Israelites who accepted Him for 3 1/2 years until His death, then His disciples confirmed...