Search results

Nobody here knows anything about your supposed battles on another forum. The point is that you came HERE to air your grievance against the Catholic Church. And, as is ALWAYS the case with ex-Catholics – you can’t come up with a SINGLE reason why you left. You “won’t” list any reasons because...

Then, WHY would you even bother posting that you left the Catholic Church because you disagree with its doctrines? This just lends credence to MY claim that ALL ex-Catholic are “Ex” Catholics out of sheer ignorance and nothing else. Thanks for making my point . . .

The Bible commands us to uses REASON (apologia) for our arguments (1 Pet. 3:15). Yours post is just another idiotic statement because you haven’t supplied any CONTEXT. How about an intelligent argument for a change?

“Presumed/Assumed” Authority?” There you go again with your Anti-Biblical, Anti-Christ nonsense. As I showed you before – it was CHRIST Himself who gave His Church supreme earthly Authority – that WHATEVER the Church loosed or held bound on earth would be loosed and held bound in Heaven (Matt...

Tell me WHY you left, then. Enlighten me.

I 've never known a person who left the Catholic Church because they disagree with doctrine. The case has ALWAYS been that they left because they were ignorant of doctrine. In other words - they lkeft because of what they THOUGHT were teachings of the Church that were simply fairy tales and...

Another idiotic post . . . If you aren’t trying to convince me of anything – then you WOULDN’T respond, Einstein. THINK about it . . .

HOW so, Einstein? I NEVER give a number – just a ballpark estimate of “tens of thousands” because the number changes DAILY. Intelligence fail oon your part . . .

No, I’m NOT a linguist – and that’s the point. I don’t pretend to BE a linguist. I leave questions about languages to the linguistic scholars. I don’t make idiotic claims that the scholars are “wrong” because they disagree with ME. I’m actually surprised at your complete cluelessness with...

Sooooo, you WEREN’T trying to convince me that YOU were right and 2000 years of the most brilliant Scripture and linguistic scholars were wrong? Then WHY bother posting your manure-fillef rant?

First of all – I NEVER say how many Protestant factions there are because that number changes every day. Protestantism is a collection of continually and perpetually-splintering sects based on the interpretational whims of whoever claims to know “better”.. Secondly – my source for “tens of...

Ignatius of Antioch Follow your bishop, every one of you, as obediently as Jesus Christ followed the Father. Obey your clergy too as you would the apostles; give your deacons the same reverence that you would to a command of God. Make sure that no step affecting the Church is ever taken by...

Ahhhhh, I see. So, I should simply reject 2000 years of Church teaching from some of the most brilliant Scripture and linguistic scholars - and just take YOUR word for it. And YOU call ME “arrogant” . . . Another psychotic rant from the KING of psychotic rants . . . Too much idiotic and...

Ummmmm – WHICH Protestants?? WHICH flavor?? The faction that teaches – The Holy Trinity – or one that doesn’t? Eternal Security (OSAS) – or one that doesn’t? Homosexuality is okay to practice – or one that doesn’t? An “Invisible Church” – or one that doesn’t? Baptismal Regeneration – or one...

Soooo, the linguists at Strong’s are in “total error” – so I should just take YOUR word for it. The uneducated opinion of an ignorant poster on an obscure little online forum? You’re not only ignorant – you’re arrogant. So, when the EXPERTS prove you wrong – THEY are wrong – is that it?? Your...

And I ALWAYS have to remind you that Jesus is NOT the oinly “Rock” in Scripture. Abraham is ALSO called “Rock” (Isa. 51:1-2). Peter is ALSO called “Rock” (Matt. 16:18). That’s what “Peter” means, Einstein . . . STUDY your Bible. You ALWAYS repeat the same idiocy about the Church NOT being a...

Your text above in RED is IDIOTIC. First, you falsely label ME as a “Romanist” – then you object to the use of the term “Protestants “to describe Protestants. I’m not a “Romanist” – I am a Catholic. - I don't even know what a "Romanist" Do you see the utter hypocrisy of your statement? As to...

WRONG. Acts 9:31 talks about how the Early Church grew throughout the region. The language used here describes the Catholic Church: “Then the church throughout Judea, Galilee, and Samaria experienced peace and thus was strengthened. Living in the fear of the Lord and in the encouragement of...

Such anger and ignorance . . . You can whine and moan against the Catholic Church ALL you want and claim that Jesus didn’t use His Church to spread the Gospel or declare the Canon of Scripture – and you’ll STILL be wrong. Time for a little History Lesson, Einstein . . . The Synod of Rome (382)...

Ummmm. Yup. The proof is in the posts . . .