Search results

False Alternative. This is one interpretation among others equally valid. Why eliminate these other interpretations, other than they don't align with the trinity narrative?

The Babylon Bee's satire is great.

Not what I quoted from the source: For some reason, you want to disregard that consistency throughout John. The article I sourced also states: a brief note should be offered here. Irenaeus (late 2nd century) would be considered earlier than B and contemporaneous with 75. The Latin text of...

Even in John 1, Jesus is not God.

You are pretending lIke this is referring to 1 person rather than two persons.

Jesus himself said the Father is the only true God. You just ignore this.

Yes. Perhaps you are reading this in a way that makes it seem your take is correct, when it’s not. The tradition that you espouse is wrong, the majority of texts say son. For some reason, you keep making Appeal to Majority. Is the word in the source material referring to offspring or creator...

Constant projection, it is with you! You make a blatant Appeal to Authority. Going to the source material, In no sense of the word “son” is “God” a valid sense of the word.

I already provide source material showing you are factually wrong on the proper translation of John 1:18. You are the one who refuses to see for yourself.

Nope. Sorry. Can't feed your relying into bad translations. From Examining the Textual Variant in John 1:18 | Ezra Institute The older English rendering, “only-begotten Son,” is common and appears elsewhere in John.

The indoctrination of the student was obvious. Attempting to diminish the issue, he asked Robinson if he’d CARE (and be here) if the women were raped by a native? Notice the Appeal to emotion? Notive the ignorance of previous US Presidents deporting millions; how Trump is NOT a racist anomaly...

In NO WAY does your reference claim anyone other than the Father is God - unless you rely on such horrible translations. Compare to most other translations. No one has ever seen God; the only begotten Son, who is in a most intimate relationship witha the Father, he has explained him.

A coworker has a bumper sticker that answers this question. It reads, "A socialist is a person too dumb to realize they are a communist."

The Left is so lost! Whoever is the supposed 'oppressed' group in their Cultural Marxist ideology can do any evil with impunity. Where are those on the Left condemning this fraud? The shield of 'racism' - not the blood of Christ - covers all sin.

Again, you just assert stuff. @Beebster observed the Bible has many analogies. You are very hostile to the wisdom of the Bible and the theology it contains. VERY hostile (removed). Sticking to the Bible is what you DO NOT DO. The Bible identifies only the father as God - in every Epistle! Jesus...

A confession destroying the trinity. Thanks for your honesty.

No. I deny the claim that ‘supports’ is not the same as an actual explicit teaching.

so true. Seems futile. <sigh>

You keep saying this but do not show how it is true. So, I will peat what I said. You are the one making the category error.

Discuss each point as it applies to the pros and cons of each argument, silly.