Search results

The testimony of its veracity is seen in the fact that you (or no Premil) have not been able to rebut any of it.

This is not true. This text is not saying that the wrath of God will last for one year as you imagine. It is telling us that this is the year that the judgment of God comes. That is it! To say otherwise is forcing your false teaching upon the sacred text. This is exactly why your teaching should...

The disciples then asked two questions in Matthew 24 in response to our Lord’s words. Matthew 24:3 records: 1. “When shall these things be?” 2. “What shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?” Mark 13:4 records: 1. “When shall these things be?” 2. “What shall be the sign...

The context of Matthew 24:22 and Mark 13:20 is clearly the destruction of Jerusalem. In His discourse in Matthew 23:37-24:2 the Lord warns, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together...

The wrath of God is sudden and wholesale destruction. No one survives. Revelation 6:12-16 relates to the final destruction described in Isaiah 34 to the appearance of the Lord at the second coming, where the wicked finally receive their reward. The sixth seal says, “And I beheld when he had...

This is not true.

I think that you think that if you keep repeating your faulty opinion that it will suddenly will become a fact. That is not the way it works. The Op actually stands unchallenged so far.

I have no desire to lie or hurt you. I apologize if i have misrepresented you. But, as per usual you avoided my rebuttal above.

You do not understand the beast. You do not understand the mark of the beast. You do not understand the abyss. You do not get it that the beast has been around for thousands of years. You do not understand that the abyss is a spiritual prison on earth.

Daniel 7:13-14 says, “I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages...

No. Your thesis is wrong. Read the Op. You will see the truth. You have avoided it for long enough!

We reign now in life, in death in heaven, when Jesus comes and forever. The reigning over the nations at the end is simply the judgment. That is it! The word means to shepherd.

Believers are reigning on earth now, believers are reigning in heaven now. It is not a difficult concept to grasp if you have eyes to see and ears to hear.

Whose cross references? Your Premillennialist mentors that have misled you. This shows how bereft you are of any credible biblical support. Where does Daniel 7:21-22 mention the second coming? Nowhere! Where does Daniel 7:21-22 teach a future 1000 years after the second coming? Nowhere. Where...

That is because they have no rebuttal for the Amil position. They therefore have to twist what it is in order to try to undermine it.

Jesus is the first fruits.

... and our part in it constitutes salvation. Those who partake in the same enter into eternal life in the here-and-now and are delivered from the second death. Simple! Biblical! True! Hope this dispels your confusion.

You mock out of ignorance. You may carry no authority and no power in the kingdom of God but born again Christians do. They carry delegated spiritual authority from heaven. They reign over the dark spiritual realm.

We reign now, when Jesus comes and forever. The reigning over the nations at the end is simply the judgment. That is it! The word means to shepherd.

Please address the detail, instead of skirting around it. That is because it is watertight.