Search results

2 Corinthians 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, and Timothy our brother, unto the church of God which is at Corinth, with all the saints which are in all Achaia: Romans 9 23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore...

Has not God replaced two with one? Ephesians 2 14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; 15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new...

2 Corinthians 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. Who do you think "us" is?

You conveniently ignored Paul's elucidation: Romans 9 7...In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. The New Covenant belongs to the faithful and obedient...

Your "consummation" has been debunked previously. Merriam-Webster doesn't do Hebrew. Bro. Strong does: Strong's Concordance kalah: completion, complete destruction, consumption, annihilation Such as what occurred in 70 AD.

Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh...

You're welcome; I'll take the Reformers' God-inspired prophetic wisdom and discernment over the fantasies and fallacies of modernist dispensational futurism; every time.

I don't disagree. The issue here is whether or not it correctly reflects Matthew 16:18. It does.

Which Revelation Scripture are you referring to specifically?

Hi, Hidden In Him The fourth kingdom is history, but the Kingdom of God/Heaven is not. God's blessings to you as well Covenantee

Daniel 7:14 describes the same kingdom as Daniel 2:44. That kingdom succeeded four earthly kingdoms, and was established in the days of the fourth kingdom, the Roman Empire. It was the New Testament Kingdom of God and Heaven. It will never be destroyed. It will stand forever.

The Reformation identified the apostasized papacy as the man of sin, who took up residence, and over the centuries usurped and arrogated spiritual authority, within the temple of God, i.e. the Church. That usurpation and arrogation included the apostate popes declaring themselves to be the...

Matt 16:18 [Codex Vaticanus Gr. 1209 (B03) (4th century)]14ac1 Καγω δε σοι λεγω οτι συ ει πετρος και επι ταυτη τη πετρα οικοδομησω μου την εκκλησιαν και πυλαι αδου ου κατισχυσουσιν αυτης πετρος is petros πετρα is petra Jesus and Peter knew the difference. John 1:42 And he brought him to...

Have fun watching what God does to that temple. I'll share my popcorn. Sozomen (ca. A.D.375-447) "Ecclesiastical History" Book V, Chapter XXII Though the emperor [Julian the Apostate] hated and oppressed the Christians, he manifested benevolence and humanity towards the Jews. He wrote to the...

Matthew 23 1 Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, 2 Saying The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: Musta been one very old and large seat. You are confused by your inability to discern the difference between Paul's spiritual and physical temples. For discerning...

Codex Vaticanus is one of the earliest biblical canons, and an important contributor to development of the final canon. It is not an Aramaic canon. It is a Greek canon, and thus incorporates the distinction between Petra and Petros in the Greek language throughout. Including Matthew 16:18.

Back to the topic: Paul wrote his epistles in Koine Greek. In them, he identified Christ as the Petra Rock: Romans 9:33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 1 Corinthians 10:4 And did all drink the...

1 & 2 Peter were written in Greek.

And the Matthew Syriac manuscript is not the oldest. It is pre-dated by other Matthew manuscripts, all of which are Greek. It is the Greek manuscripts in which the distinction between petros and petra is preserved.

I don't have to travel to see the Greek original.