Search results

Jesus encapsulated the heart od this teaching in TWO verses that seems to have eluded SDAs – indeed ALL radical Sabbatarians, After eating the bread meant for the Temple priests and giving some to his disciples, He said: Mark 2:27-28 “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. So...

NO - you gave me Biblical reasons why men screw up by rejecting God's will and decidoing for themselves what they will choose to believe. THAT'S how you get tens of thousands of perpwtually-splinbtering factions that ALL claim to have been "guided" to this confusion by the Holy Spirit. What a...

Mpses DIDN'T teach twelve differett sets of doctrines. Hr taught ALL TWELVE Trives to abide by the ONE Law. Luther was NOTHING like Moses. By ois own admission, he opened a Pandora's Box of confusion . . . "There are almost as many sects and beliefs as there are heads; this one will not admit...

You're arguing in CIRCLES sgsin. Firt, YOU rejected priestly celibacy by eroneously trlating it to the "doctrines of demons" that Paul was describing in 1 Tim. 4. I responded by giving you a MUCH needed Bible Lesson on Paul's stance on celibacy as a more excellent way to serve God (1 Cor...

WRONG. Isaiah 8:20 It says absoluttely nothing about Sola Scriptura - explicitly or implicitly. I speaks about "the law and to the testimony". Here are some examples of the OI "Testimony" from the NT that were as binding oon the Jews as what was written: Matt. 2:23 - the prophecy "He shall be a...

Yes, I realize you're a non-Catholic - but are yo a Christian? What is your faith tradition? As to the "Traditions" you listed - you seem confused. Praying to Mary and the saits has absolutely NOTHING to do with a "level of sin". We simply ASK them to pray FOR us. That's what "PRay" means: Full...

I never said that. And there is NO such thing as “The Protestant Church”. It is a disjointed mess of tens of thousands of perpetually-splintering sects that ALL teach different doctrines - while ALL claiming to have been “guided” to this confusion by the Holy Spirit. Ummmmmm, Moses didn’t lead...

I’ve already shown you this before – but here is a refresher . . . Acts 9:31 talks about how the Early Church grew throughout the region. The language used here describes the Catholic Church: “Then the church throughout Judea, Galilee, and Samaria experienced peace and thus was strengthened...

Uh huh. And tens of thousands of flawed men decided that they EACH heard the Holy Spirit teach them tens of thousands of different sets of doctrines until you have what you have today: Tens of thousands of disjointed and perpetually-splintering factions that ALL teach different doctrines based...

And ONLY an idiot or an atheist would NOT understand that sex outside of marriage is called, “Fornication” in Scripture and is strictly forbidden. SO, Einstein – this IS a conversation about CELIBACY – as endorsed by Paul in the verses I already presented to you back in post #93. The fact that...

I asked you for specifics. WHISH Catholic Traditions have “changed considerably”?? As to your question about Protestants – are you serious – or have you NEVER studied history? Did you never go to school? Are YOU a non-Catholic Christian – if do you have another faith tradition?

And sooooo, you simply ignore the words of Paul so you can continue your campaign of idiocy and hatred. I gave you several examples of how Paul ENDORSED the idea of celibacy as a more excellent way to serve God – and you FAILED to address this fact. And since you can’t address it – you’ve LOST...

The “doctrines of devils” that Paul was referring to were the doctrines of the Gnostic heretics. Good grief - any FIRST-YEAR Theology student should know this. He lists a few of their teachings: 1 Tim. 4:1-5 Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by...

2 questions: 1. Which Catholic Traditions have “changed considerably”? 2 WHERE did Protestants get their OT Canon of Scripture?

We were discussing a matter of HISTORY – not Scripture. That’s WHY the ECFs were cited, Einstein. Good grief - what frightening ignorance . . .

Soooo, once again – you couldn’t address ANY of the non-Scriptural Protestant terminologies I threw at you. EPIC FAIL . . . Yup. What’s the matter - did you miss 2 Thess. 2:15?? Go back to post #74, where I posted it in pretty BLUE letters . . .

“Desperate”? What is desperate are your extremely tangential rants that go in all different directions – and all eventually steer BACK to your bizarre obsession with the Sabbath. As to your “historical” manure above – the Church in different countries is STILL the Church. It’s NOT a “different...

And this says absolutely NOTHING about Sola Scriptura - but thanks foe trying. Constantine legalized Christianity - that's it. The fact that the ONLY game in town - as far as Christianity is concerned - was the Catholic Church should tell you something. Sure, there were some hheretical sects...

The fact that YOU don't have the foggiest understanding that I showed these writings simply to illustrate that Petreine Primacy was something that was already believed centuries BEFORE Constantine doesn't surprise me. That kind of idiocy still blows me away - but it doesn't surprise me . . .