Search results

And Jesus said that those - like YOU - who reject His Church, reject HIM anf the ONE who sent Him (Luke 10:16). Good luck with that . . .

That’s precisely the kind of unintelligent non-response I would expect from the likes of you. Oh – and you STILLL haven’t addressed the fat that the following Greek scholarly sources DISAFREE with you on the meaning of “Epignosis”: - Richard Chenevix Trench - J.B. Lightfoot - Vine's Expository...

And YOU ate a LIAR. I not only gave you the Strong's definition for "Epignosis" - I gave you a LITANY of Protestant scholarship on thus Biblical term in post #182. YOU ressponded with your usual idiotic denials with ZERO evidence to the contrary - because I basically schooled you on a Biblical...

Accusiong people of "Lies" without producing ANY evidence to the contrary is not only stupid - it's nothing more than an unsubstantiatted accusation. You haven't "Refuted" a SINGLE thing regarding the Greek word, "Epignosis" that can ONLY sapply to a born-again person.. James 5 ALSO speaks of...

CALLING someone a "Liar" is NOT a refutation - it's an accusation. PROVING that someone is a liar is a refutation, Einstein . . .

You’re absolutely right – there was NO argument. There was a list of Biblical fats from ME, followed by litany scholarly evidence – and a big fat fail from YOU in the form of yet another denial. A “refutation” by definition is a presentation of evidence to the contrary. A denial is NOT a...

That’s not a refutation – it’s just another pathetic, impotent DENIAL. I asked for a refutation of the BIBLICAL term, “Epignosis”. Your refusal to offer a refutation of the overwhelming evidence I presented against you is a mammoth FAIL. You’ve LOST this argument . . .

That’s a LIE. I just gave you some of the most respected names in Protestant theology who ALL AGREE that “Epignosis” can ONLY pertain to a born again person. You have offered ZERO refutation of this and have only given your usual denials. SO – if you have a valid argument against the scholarly...

And YOUR constant deniuals of Scripture don't makt it "untrue". Nothing new . . . The Greek word used in 2 Pet. 3:17 is στεριγμοσ (stay-rig-mos') - which means a "firm condition". This is the security that Peter is talking about and that ONLY a born again person in Christ can have. Peter warns...

Jude 1:24 states firmly: Now unto him that is ABLE to guard you from stumbling, and to set you before the presence of his glory without blemish in exceeding joy He is ABLE to guard us - IF we continue to faithfully trust in Him. NOWHERE does it say that we are "automatically" and permanently...

This is unBiblical fiction. I've shown you MANY time that the bible warns converted, born again Christians with an "Epignosis" of Christ - that they can fall away and LOSE their secure position - YOUR denials, notwithstanding . . . Hebrews 10:26-27 “If we sin deliberately AFTER receiving...

The Catholic Church recognize Trinitarian Protestant Baptism as vallid. Hoervrt - whether or not a person is Baptized in the Holy Spirit is NOT a guarantee of Heravrn. You can fall away by your own doing at ANY point in your life - as the Bible warns us (Matt. 7:19-23, Matt. 10:22, Matt...

And when did I ever make that claim? I have stated ALL along that Baptism is the FIRST step for a Christian. Living a life of doing the will of God (Matt. 7:21) and enduring to the end in faith (Matt. 10:22) is what is requried of us to enter Heaven.

Explain why Paul differentiates between the clergy and the Laity with in those verses with the words, "I", "WE", "US" and "YOU". So WE are ambassadors for Christ, as if God were appealing through US. WE implore YOU on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God.” "For indeed what I have forgiven, if...

EVERY ONE of these verses is a warning to converted, bopen again Christians who have been indwelt with the Holy Spirit - NOT to fall nack into darkness, lest they LOSE their secure position: Romans 11:22 “See, then, the kindness and severity of God: severity toward those who fell, but God's...

Funny how the Jews believed in this same "fantasy" . . . In 2 Macc. 42-46, we see that Judas Maccabeus prays for the men of his army, killed in battle. Verse 44 says, “… for if he were not expecting the fallen to rise again, it would have been useless and foolish to pray for them in death.”...

WRONG - the Bible says different. Paul receognizes the Clergy/Laity distinction when he sates the following: 1 Thess. 5:12 We ask you, brothers, to respect those who are laboring among you and who are OVER YOU in the Lord and who admonish you, 1 Tim. 5:17 Let the elders that RULE WELL be...

Duck and move . . . Not bad. Beats answering the questions and actually addressing my points, I guess . . .

Deflecting again - as usual . . . I knew you wouldn't be able to address the truth I spoke about your rejection of the Word of God. Luke 10:16 is a stern warning to prideful, faithless people like you . . .

Ummmmm, NOT according to the Bible. You see - the Apostles knew there would be people like YOU who would try to usurp the Ministerial priesthood without the Church's Authority. That's why Jude warned against such a thing (Jude 1:11) - comparing people like that to the Rebellion of Korah and...