Search results

Yes the bible states that the flood was Gods judgement on the people of the world it doesn't say people and angelic beings.

You can't be serious I have asked you 5 times now I am starting to think that you maybe just playing games so don't worry about it.

Of course the angles from revelation 12 aren’t the ones in Genesis 6 I never once said that they were. I already refuted post 722 and I believe that I showed through the scriptures how the sones of god were from Seths offspring. Why do you constantly ignore my scripture backing when I don’t...

And once again you refuse to answer my question why?

Yet once again you didn't answer my question could you please just answer it? Yes God judged the fallen angles who sinned but He never once in the bible said that the sin was fornicating with the daughter of men. Jude stated this 6 And the angels who did not keep their positions of authority...

No they haven't and I'm asking you the question which you haven't answered 3 times So once more how do you explain Gensis stating that God only judged the people of the earth (no mention of angelic beings)? This can determine the interpretation of those scriptures you referenced which don't...

Your adding you view of what you think it means when it doesn't actually state that and I quoted exactually what the scripters said.

How can you say that there is no avoidance when 3 times I have asked you to explain Gensis stating that God only judged the people of the earth (no mention of angelic beings) and you haven't answered yet?

Revelation 12:7-8 shows when and why the fallen angles lost their place in heaven. 7 Then war broke out in heaven. Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back. 8 But he was not strong enough, and they lost their place in heaven.

Once again you are assuming and adding to the scriptures. I quoted exactly what the scriptures said. You also are still avoiding when I mentioned that the bible states that the flood was Gods judgement on the people of the world it doesn't say people and angelic beings.

What I said was that those verses didn't tie the fallen angles to the sons of God. Also verse 5 starts with "and" showing that its not the same

You are assuming and adding words to the scriptures the sexuality was about sodom and Gomorrah it wasn’t mentioned in the people from Egypt or the fallen angels in Jude. The proof is the very next verse verse 8 which also has no mention of sexual sin. The Jews from Egypt were judged because...

I did write the OP thus that answered the question. Gensis states more than once that God judged the unfaithful people with the flood not that God judged the unfaithful people and angelic beings.

Thanks but no problem I didn't take any offence

Why did you avoid the rest of the post about only people perished in the flood? You reference Jude 1:5 and here is the verse 5 Though you already know all this, I want to remind you that the Lord[c] at one time delivered his people out of Egypt, but later destroyed those who did not believe...

The verses that you provided in Peter and Jude have no bearing on this subject. Nothing in those verses are tied to the sons of God in Genesis. They actually go against it because Jude talks about events after the flood and Peter states that God brought judgement against people (not angelic...

Yes true but the message is that the faithful dwindled down to just one man and it was going to end with Noah and God had to step in. That is the real message. If the sons of God weren’t the faithful then what happened to them? Why did it come to only one man? Think about it why did God...

Thanks for your post but yes it is in contrast because its not all of man kind it’s taking about in the text it’s the faithful in contrast to the unfaithful. It was the faithful who conformed to the unfaithful how else could the faithful come down to just one man Noah? Thus the reason that God...

the sons of God are whoever are faithful to Him weather angles or humans. Genesis 6:7 proves that in this case they were human if not how would you explain it?

I did use scripture in the OP and my last post to prove my point.