Search results

Just some Protestant ministers wearing vestments - or asYOU call them, "Dresses." Not sure why it offends you. Here's one in a hat . . .

Now, my faithless friuend - the BIBLE defines God quite clearlty . . . The Father is God Ephesians 4:6 One God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. Psalm 68:5 Father of the fatherless and protector of widows is God in his holy habitation. Malachi 2:10 Have we not...

And as I have had to educate you on SEVERAL occasions - "In the namr of" means, "By the Authority of". Time for another linguistics lesson . . . From Macmillan Dictionary: 1. REPRESENTING someone or something Ex. - They said they came “in the name of peace.” From Cambridge Dictionary: 1...

Another ignorant post by yet another ignotant anti-Catholic. Do you feel the same way about these Protestant guys in "dresses"? 1 Thess. 5:12 We ask you, brothers, to respect those who are laboring among you and who are OVER YOU in the Lord and who admonish you, 1 Tim. 5:17 Let the elders...

No - jusy stupidity, ignorance and spiritual pride. YOUR rejection of Jesus Christ as God is a position I wouldn't wish upon my worst ebemy. Good luck telling HIM that . . .

Nope - just YOUR perverted understanding of it. Ummmm, maybe the faithless doubter doesn't believe that Jesus commanded Baptism in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19) . . .

I'm not trying to "shut you down". I am merely exposing your anti-Biblical nonsense. I have NO doubt that you will be here again spewing your falsehoods - and I will be right there to expose them . . .

Why? YOU keep going from thread to thread trying to pass off this nonsense as the fact - even AFTER you've been shown the truth of Scripture. You're not interested in the truth - so I've made it my mission to expose this kind of stuff so that other people don't get sucked in to your errors.

ALL of your nonsesne rests onb the last part above in RED. You are corectr that John 1:1 doesn't mention the name of "Jesus". HOWEVER - only an illiterate would NOT be able to understand that the entire CONTCT of who is being spoken of here IS Jesus. John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word...

Actually - you got it wrong again - big surprise . . . It' 1+1+1=3 in 1 3 Persons - 1 God. Study your Bible, Einstein . . .

I don't need to "debunk" any of your faithless inventions. Jesus already did that . . . Matt. 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit And, I' STILL waiting for a solid, Scriptural refutation of post...

WRONG, Einstein. I gave you no less than TWO scholarly examples of PROTESTANTS who teach the polyvalent symbolism of Revelation back in post #306. As for Acts 2:38 - I completely agree with that verse. I simply understand it better than you . . .

You FINALLY got something rught. The First PERSONof the Trinity and the Second PERSON of the Trinity are BOTH calling themselves, "The Alpha and the Omega" - because they BOTH are, along with the Third PERSON of the Trinity. Three PERSONS - One GOD. As for the verse above in RED - your...

Ummmm - NOT according to YOUR Protestant scholars, Einstein. PROTESTANT author Gregory Beale dtatrs that, “Most of Revelation’s symbols have multiple associations or meanings and … the interpreter can never be sure that all the multiple meanings of a symbol have been discovered.” PROTESTANT...

No - pay attention, Einstein: God says: Rev. 1:8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” Jesus Christ says: Rev. 22:13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.” Jesus Christ IS God. There...

THANK YOU fopr lyng again piublicly. It makes your point even that much more stupid . . .

God says: Rev. 1:8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” Jesus Christ says: Rev. 22:13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.” You LOSE . . .

No - I just have a better understanding than you - because I trust in Christ's Church - as HE commanded (Matt. 16:18-19, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 15:12-15, John 20:21-23).

Ummmm, as I educated you in my last post - John 1:14 clearly states that God Himself became flesh and dwelt among us - and that enture narrative of John 1 ius about Jesus (God). So - feel free to continue mocking God by denying Him and see where that gets you in the end. Matt. 10:33 "... but...

And, apparently, YOU don't understand the, eaning of a polyvalent symbol. Allow me to educate you . . . A polyvalent syybol simply means a symbol woth more than oone meaning (poly) - and the Book of Revelation is filled with such symbols. Most Biblical scholars agree that the Woman represents...