Search results

Yjr [[rphobotion agaiunst sonsuming blood in yhr OT was that the LIFE of the animal is in the blood (Deut. 12:23). WHOSE life DO we wan6t inside of us? That of Jesus Crist. That's why He said: John 6:53-55 Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man...

Goo luck telling Jesus that His instruuctions were "idiotic" when He is judging you . . . Matt. 28:19 "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit"

Yup - we love ALL good art that depicts our Lord and His faithful servants. Ummmm, speaking of "giant" statues - here's a shrine to your Protestant Fathers . . .

So, you actually believe that the flesh of our Savior Jersus christ profits "NOTHING"?? Good luck telling HIM that when He is judging uyou . . . Matt. 10:32-33 So everyone who acknowledges me before men, I also will acknowledge before my Father who is in heaven, but whoever denies me before men...

I think it's frightening that, as a Christian - you actually believe that Jesus's flesh profits "nothing". It is HIS flesh that was hung on a cross for the sins of the world. Jesus said this in Johyn 6:63 because the crowd refused to accept what He was telling them. It was THEIR human...

That's funny - because that is EXACTLY what the pagan Romas accused the Early Christians of for their deep-rooted faith in the Real Presence - "Cannibalism". You should be very proud . . . And tell me - since when does "REMEMBRANCE" translate to "symbolic" or "metaphorical"?? Exactly WHICH part...

It's really just a case of them reffusing to see that "In the name of" simply means, "By the Auythority of".

No - Jesus meant His BLOOD - not a metaphor or syymbol. In yhe Bread of Life Discourse in John 6- John doesn't use the normal word for human eating (Phagon). Heused the word, "Trogon" - which is the way an animal rips apart and gnaws on his food to accentuare Jesus's point here. John 6:53-55...

This is a complete misunderstandinding of the promises for those who partake in the Eucharust, per John 6. If John 6 were the ONLY Chapter in the NT - you would have a better case. Unfortunately for your argumennt, though - Jesus ALSO said that we must - - Be baptized (Matt. 28:19-20, John 3:5...

That's great - because I don't know ANYONE who teaches this nonsense.

Ummmm - JESUS said: Matt. 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit When in doubt - ALWAYS go with what GOD says. As I've always said - if you spent as much time actually STUDYING the Wotd of God as you...

No - it's HIS instructions that count . . . Matt. 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit Oh - uhhhhh, "LOL" . . .

I didn't say it was an "SDA picture". I said it was an SDA misrepresentation - which it most definitely IS. I can take ANY photograph, zoom-in and create ANY kind of narrative that I want - but I'm not a dishonest SDA. As to your obsession with the Sabbath - you have perverted its meaning by...

Just as I thought. Not a SINGLE Baptism Rite chronicled in the NT. What YOU just presented was a PAST TENSE statement about a Baptism that took place. The sad part is you YOU can't tell the difference. They WERE Baptized "in the name of" the Lord Jesus means: The WERE Baptized "by the...

Since your friend @user has repearedly failed at this, perhars YOU can - a) Show me a SINGLE example of a Baptism in the NT where the detaiols of the Baptism are chronicled? b) Show me a SINGLE verse where the ACTUAL WORDSsof Baptism are used IN the ritual? A word of advice though - he already...

Just as YOU have failed to produce ANY example of a Baptism ritual in the NT You can't because it DOESN'T exist. And you STILL haven't answered my question about how you reject the Didache when it comesa to Baptism - yet you wholeheartedly accept the Didache when it comes to the ending doxology...

Ummmmm - NONE of the examples you gave were Baptisms - AS they were happening. They were about past or future Baptisms. And as for, "In the na,e of Jesus" - appatrntly you were alseep for the first THREE PAGES of posts where I repeatedly explained this to you. Here is the scholarly information...

Yes, you've used this misleading picture before and I had to expose the factout to you that you only provided a SNIPPET - and NOT the entire image. This is the Pope during a mass - and there are MORE than "4 living vreatures" around him in the UNCROPPED image. But then, again - who ever...

You missed the ENTIRE 2nd point I mafe in my last post. It's NOT that Jesus is teaching about the Eucharist here - He is showing the crowd that they can come to their God in prayer - as their FATHER. They were not used to thinking of Him that way. THEIR "Fathers" were men like Abraham, Isaac...

WOW - I overestimated your abilities. I guess I'll have to dumb-it-down even more. I'll just go verse-by-verse to make it easy on you . . . Acts 2:38 "Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the NAME of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive...