Search results

Isaiah 42:1 Listen to me in silence, O coastlands; let the peoples renew their strength; let them approach, then let them speak; let us together draw near for judgment. 2 Who stirred up one from the east whom victory meets at every step? He gives up nations before him, so that he tramples kings...

Actually it would seem an ice asteroid belt, which not only came down as rain on Earth as evidenced by the iridium (the only source is extraterrestrial) sediment layer; but also came down on Mars as a water/ice clastic flow and created the ravines which have been called "canals"; and also...

Did anyone notice that Keraz NEVER ANSWERED WHO THE "EAST" WAS? I didn't notice it at all. He completely fooled me, and it wasn't until I thought about his response, reading it over and over and over for some connection to where Isaiah 41:2 said "east" that after about a HOUR of concentration...

You are more dishonest than the "world", because you profess righteousness, but practice deceit. -- After slandering me, I asked whether you read the Psalms in context with modern Jewish History, and you divert the discussion to nonsense. Woe to you. Bobby Jo

Dangerous leviathans are HUNTED to extinction. They don't simply go extinct without some other influence. Bobby Jo

Re-Post: Bobby Jo said: Scripture says to "try the spirits" and see if they be of GOD. But nobody has to. They can deny Scripture, can deny Jesus, and can deny GOD. Do you deny Scripture? Have you read the 19th Book of the Bible to see of the Chapters are prophetic for the 1900's, -- or...

If you purport the same event, then who is the "east" in 41:2, and why is China involved, when China is reserved for when Russia attacks from the North, and China attacks the Russians from the "east"? Could it be that you can only explain parsed verses, but not compete passages? You seem VERY...

Isaiah 41 1 Listen to me in silence, O coastlands; let the peoples renew their strength; let them approach, then let them speak; let us together draw near for judgment. 2 Who stirred up one from the east whom victory meets at every step? He gives up nations before him, so that he...

More hogwash. Do you think GOD is not rational, that HE doesn't present his TRUTHS so that anyone seeking HIS information can't see LITERAL WORDS and LITERAL THOUGHTS toward a LITERAL OCCURRENCE? Religious people tend to hold themselves above others, and THAT's why GOD blinds the religious...

Better stated: HISTORY documents that Jewish Israelis have been reconstituted into a nation/state. But there's also a reason why beaches have a shortage of sand. Bobby Jo

I disagree. I would argue that FACTS are FACTS, no matter the audience. So when we have a prophetic sequence of world empires we can evaluate it against what has transpired and discover whether Scripture is TRUE, or it's false: Deut. 18:22 when a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if the...

Nope. According to the angel's guidance in Dan. 12:4 & 9,the the words are "shut up and sealed until the time of the end". And reading further, no other generation has had the ability to travel some 60 to 600 mph, and no other generation has had virtually infinite knowledge literally at their...

Scripture says to "try the spirits" and see if they be of GOD. But nobody has to. They can deny Scripture, can deny Jesus, and can deny GOD. Do you deny Scripture? Have you read the 19th Book of the Bible to see of the Chapters are prophetic for the 1900's, -- or do you just scoff? Bobby Jo

No assumption, it's pretty obvious that you don't want to know what these Chapters and Verses say, so you defer YOUR RESPONSIBILITY so you can nit-pick every word, every observation, and every argument that you want me make. However, I have no argument to make. If you hate GOD's Word so much...

I've got the time, and the proficiency. How about if we start with the simple, and progress to the complex. So Dan. 2 provides a sequence of world empires which the commentators INSIST is roughly: 1. Gold, Babylon 2. Silver, Medo/Persia 3. Bronze, Greece 4.a. Iron, Rome 4.b. Clay, Revived...

I would most strongly disagree. You appear to propose that GOD can do wrong, but HE can't. HE can only do RIGHT. Now on the other hand WE can do all kinds of wrong, and rationalize/justify it in our own intellect. But whether OUR choice is by might/right/wrong, there's an ultimate right...

It seems incorrect that they "thought" but more accurately "rationalized". Just look in this Forum where so many disregard Scripture in deference to their FALSE DOCTRINES not because they thought, but because they rationalized. It was TRUE when Cain murdered Able; when the Jews murdered Jesus...

If there were no GOD, and no conscience, then you'd be correct. But because we have BOTH, we can rely upon Scripture where it's available, and our conscience where Scripture is unavailable. But to pre-suppose we have neither Scripture nor conscience is incorrect. Bobby Jo

... and BOTH will go through the Tribulation, for which we're already some 25 of 42 months into. Then after the thousand years are ended, the DEAD are raised (with the exception of the martyred for not receiving the Mark of which ONLY THEY will Return with Jesus), and then those that alive and...

... and it occurs after the DEAD are raised, at the end of the thousand years. Bobby Jo