Search results

That was NOT Apostle Paul's meaning of that 1 Corinthians 14:34 verse. That verse has been used and abused against women speaking in the Church per that old tradition of men for centuries, just because those don't pay attention to everything Paul said in that specific section of 1 Cor.14...

This whole argument about free will comes from Protestant Reformation doctrines on predestination by John Calvin in the 16th century. Here is a definition of that idea from Wikipedia... Stemming from the theology of John Calvin, Reformed theologians teach that sin so affects human nature that...

The two 1260 days periods that make up the Dan.9:27 "one week" doesn't have to change anything. The latter 30 day period, and 45 day period at the end of Dan.12 are their 'own' time periods that happen AFTER the two 1260 day periods. This is so easy to know, simply because if you try to add the...

Yeah, but it will also involve earth changes that we don't see today in this present world, like the literal return of God's River of Genesis 2 and the Tree of Life.

I guess the Biblically illiterate that don't study their Old Testament Books will laugh at the follow Scripture too about Christ's future "thousand years" reign that begins at His future 2nd coming... Isa 24:21-23 21 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the LORD shall punish the host of...

Whoah! The "little horn" of Daniel 7:8 is about the "beast" king of Revelation 17:12-13, the 7th king still yet future to us today that will come at the end of this present world. The 6th beast king was in Apostle John's day per Revelation 17:10, and was Roman emperor Domitian, confirmed by...

Still trying to find a way to slide... your complete destruction of the earth view past those Psalms Scriptures I posted? Admit it, when you said a "completely" new earth in your post, you meant a total scrap of this present whole planet, and then God starting all over again with making a...

Right... Yes... of course, and that New Testament idea involves being "born again" of The Holy Spirit (John 3).

No Biblical evidence for the above. That idea is from men's doctrines who don't understand about the 2 separate dimensions of God's creation. And even those pastors who do understand, they aren't allowed to preach about it by their denominational organizations. It's important to understand...

Another pointer about the false ideas of Full Preterism is, just why... would those on that false doctrine believe Christ's 2nd coming already was history? It is so... easy to prove false by keeping God's Word as written, so why would men promote such a blatantly false idea? Do you know how the...

Some on man's extremely... FALSE doctrine of Full Preterism have made it here to this Forum. What is that doctrine? Full Preterism wrongly believes Lord Jesus Christ's future 2nd coming is only meant 'spiritually'. On top of that false idea, they also believe that the 2nd coming already...

Read The Old Testament much?? Ps 78:69 69 And He built His sanctuary like high palaces, like the earth which He hath established for ever. KJV Ps 104:5 5 Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever. KJV

Of course that statement above is NOT true. It goes against the Ezekiel 40 through 47 Chapters which are all.. future prophecy that happen AFTER Jesus' future 2nd coming. And don't be confused by its mention of sacrifices, because Jesus fulfilled that upon His cross. Ezekiel 47 spotlights future...

Your reasoning is just silliness. The Rev.12:1-2 symbols define who that first mention of the symbolic "woman" represents. It's about old covenant Israel, NOT Christ's Church. You left out... the part in Isaiah 66 that God was pointing to Jerusalem with that idea of Rev.12:2. Isa 66:9-13 9...

Doesn't matter what you think about that, the above still does not agree with actual Bible Scripture. The following verse by Paul in Hebrews is simple and easy, IF heeded, showing only TWO comings by Lord Jesus Christ, not three, not four, etc. Heb 9:28 28 So Christ was once offered to bear...

When YOU make FALSE CLAIMS that I think Jesus' second coming happens at His resurrection, which is something I NEVER SAID, then Yeah, it means YOU ARE LOOKING FOR AN ARGUMENT, AND NOT A CIVIL DEBATE. You said to me in your post #99: "You are making no sense. Again, the second coming of Jesus...

Not a total destruction of the earth, like you have been mistaught. Did the flood of Noah's day totally destroy this earth? NOPE! Neither will God's consuming fire totally destroy this earth, but only cleanse the SURFACE of this earth of man's works. This earth is forever. So you should work...

Not me that has misunderstood the symbolic "woman" of those first two Rev.12 verses. I have already PROVEN IT TOO, by showing those symbols were first written of in the Genesis 37 Chapter! Thus the Biblical proof I have given on that is SOLID. So if you instead want to REJECT what the Bible...

You really don't know how much you are actually pointing to YOURSELF with the above. You need to learn the difference in God's Word when it is giving LITERAL TRUTH vs. symbolic metaphors.

I get your "sleuth" meaning, but I wouldn't use that term. I'd use something like detective, or powers of deduction, which actually is still not the way to understand this matter in God's written Word. Yes, a LITERAL CLOUD, in the sky above the earth. Or do you have a problem understanding...