Search results

Our ascending to heaven after our body dies is not a resurrection. Believers ascend to heaven a living soul, as a spiritual body after we die, because in time, we had part in the first resurrection. The first resurrection man must partake in time to overcome the second death is the resurrection...

In our discussion here you've offered commentary from others, and your opinion. When I discuss the Bible, I expect no more from others than I do myself. He who alleges must prove through the Scripture the opinion they hold is biblical. Otherwise, it remains unbiblical opinion.

If the first resurrection is physical and future of the righteous, followed at some point by the physical resurrection of the wicked, why does John see martyred faithful saints alive in heaven after physical death because they lived and reigned with Christ for a thousand years? How can the...

How about proving what you allege? He who alleges MUST prove! Otherwise, all we have from you is unbiblical opinion!

Typical! Unbiblical opinion without a single verse of support from Scripture!

Not only do I not find one thousand more years of time after Christ returns, apparently you cannot find proof from Scripture for this unbiblical doctrine either. You rely on the commentary by Clarke, but he shows he has no understanding of the mystery of God that shall be finished when the...

Should I assume you don't have an answer for why you link Amillennialism with what you call Reformed Preterist Eschatology? I see no logic in this reply. We live in time, which is what a thousand years and one day are. Spiritual eternal life begins within believers when we are born again from...

I know what Full Preterism and Partial Preterism teaches. What I question is what you call Reformed Preterist Eschatology, and link to Amillennialism? Perhaps it's because you view a thousand years as symbolically representing the Lord's eternal spiritual realm??? How can time exist in the...

I don't get what you mean by reformed preterist eschatology? What do you mean by the Lord's eternal spiritual realm of time, which both one day and a thousand years equate to? How is time given earth spiritual?

Reply #1305 "The very term (Amil) means there is no literal 1,000 years It appears you need to grasp the fact "Thousand Years" in Revelation 20:4-6 is doing nothing more than explaining (The Lord's Eternal Spiritual Realm) where One Day Is A "Thousand Years" "No Literal Time" Today in a world...

Where in Scripture can we find these one thousand years of more time after the Lord returns the second time? According to Scripture time shall be no longer when the seventh angel begins to sound. Why shall time be no longer when the seventh angel begins to sound? According to John its...

Do you agree the non-literal thousand years equates to time? If you believe it does, when do you believe this non-literal thousand years shall begin and end?

Paul is speaking to the Church in Thessalonica, saying these faithful saints living in the first century AD they will suffer persecutions and tribulations, they are called to endure. This is not speaking of the return of Christ when the last trumpet begins to sound. Paul is telling us the...

I see you've added your spin to Scripture once more. Christ is not telling His disciples to pray His Kingdom would come on earth. If He were He would not say "My Kingdom is not of this world". (Jo 18:36) There you go again, forcing contradiction into the Word of God. Christ teaches His...

The reason those who believe the doctrine of Amillennialism presents biblical truth refuse to play along with you is because you have not honestly portrayed our doctrine. We all know why! You have no understanding of Amillennialism! The only one forfeiting anything in this thread is you! You...

I only pointed that out because you said "Of course the son of man has not came yet." Since Christ, The Messiah prophesied of Old has indeed come in TIME, since His advent, we look for Him to return the second time when the seventh angel begins to sound that time shall be no more. Many seem to...

That seems to be what he is best at!

Since I have no understanding of this gobbledygook, I give up!

Ron, this exposes the difficulty Amill is up against when discussing eschatology with Premillennialists. Most (at least most of those I know) embracing the doctrine of Amill have come from Premillennialism. So, we understand the doctrine of millennialism quite well. Premillennialists on the...

I don't care if I'm put on someone's ignore list. That will not prevent me from replying against doctrine I can prove from Scripture is unbiblical.