Search results

Actually the coment Hale/Bopp was a prophetic sign which hadn't been seen before, -- given that the previous naked-eye visibility duration was approximately 3 months, but Hale/Bopp was visible for approximately 9 months. And a 300% change is significant, and the prophetic event was also...

To All, One of the problems with prophetic events is "perspective". (We often have some asteroid/comet event, -- some 20,000 are known --, without any Headlines.) Interestingly the news in late October of 2019 reported a cluster of three asteroids approaching our planet within some 600,000...

How many "SEVENS" are in Scripture (463) -- AND THEY"RE ALL ASSOCIATED!!! The Dan. 9:24 "SEVENTY" are "SEVENTY WEEKS OF VENGEANCE". Whew, Bobby Jo To All, There is no shortage of bizarre doctrines. In the '60's the source was usually drugs, but today EVERY WACKY IDEA has merit, and...

I don't believe that "Cain" was a one-world-government. Perhaps to assume a parallel comparison, is as "assume" is accused. Bobby Jo

That's not how I work. Scripture and History agree, but most don't know either one. And so what they means nothing to the uninformed. Thus each person MUST be informed so that they can TRULY JUDGE both the LAW (Scripture) and the EVIDENCE (History) to reach a correct VERDICT. And at this...

I have an IDEA: If you understood what the BEAST was, you'd probably come closer to what the MARK is. I.e., if the BEAST is the RCC, there might be a religious connotation; if the BEAST is a Computer, there might be a digital connotation; and so forth. Until you figure out the motivation...

Some people see the clock pendulum swinging, but can't read the hands on the clock. Bobby Jo

To All, Scripture says that we see through a glass darkly. And sometimes men look like trees, and trees look like men. So if a person gets the two crossed, HE'S CRITICIZED. But what are the options, -- Don't Look? Don't Examine? Don't Consider? If prophecy weren't important, GOD wouldn't...

Really? You checked out the first citation? -- Pastor David Wilkerson's False Plan Of Salvation Pray tell, exactly what was disturbing in ANYTHING that Wilkerson said? And as far as the second citation, let me suggest that some of those prophecies may have had a "time" issue, but not a...

What's even MORE DISTURBING is that a person who we thought was PERFECT, was found GUILTY of a CRIME SO HEINOUS he had to be hung on a cross. Satan is the accuser of the bretheren. -- Don't join satan. Bobby Jo

Well, I see the elephant, but only two blind men so far. And instead of having two attributes (one attribute per person) as in the original story, BOTH are all reporting the SAME attribute. It might help if a person understood what the BEAST IS, and then figure out what the IMAGE OF THE BEAST...

AGREED, -- 1,000% !!! And even MORE IMPORTANT are the government (USDA; Department of Health) WARNINGS against using Colloidal Silver, which they advise can cause SERIOUS Health Risks. So before ANYONE attempts to use this concoction, I'd MOST STRONGLY urge them to Research the Scientific...

To All, It would seem that while the world deteriorates into anarchy, so too the church where many FALSE doctrines abound. And because these so-called "christians" can't defend their doctrines, they apparently feel they MUST resort to personal attacks -- which Scripture warns against: Mtt...

... So you see the silliness (read: insanity) were we came from, and the result we arrived at! :) Bobby Jo

Yep, -- "good" means acceptable. Thus the commentator sequence 4a/4b was acceptable, and I acknowledged your 4a/4b acceptance without any rebuttal. You apparently are unstable as Scripture defines in James 1:7 and James 1:8. Bobby Jo To All, It's not hard finding a persons limitations. And...

To All, Jesus used parables. He didn't explain the LITERAL CONCEPTS to either the religious or the masses. And @Truther would apparently have you interpret ALL SCRIPTURE as literal, because you're too stupid to understand figurative/allegorical/simile depictions. Well, maybe you're not too...

You started out with an opinion, -- that the commentator version was satisfactory. And now you've apparently changed your mind and chosen to believe Scriipture, but denied that you had to change your opinion by saying you "had no opinion". Jmes 1:7 For let not that man suppose that he will...

GO AHEAD?!? With what? -- You agreed with the commentator 4a/4b, and now we can't "GO AHEAD" until we figure out whether the commentators are correct in their 4a/4b assertion, or whether Scripture is correct in the 4,3,5,2,1 = FIVE sequence. MEN; or SCRIPTURE & History. Choose ONE. Bobby Jo

Excellent, -- you agree with the commentators. Do you have an opinion as to what I call the "Intelligent Design" of the Dan. 2:45 sequence Iron, Bronze, Clay, Silver, Gold = 4,3,5,2,1 = FIVE, -- in which Scripture appears to contradict the commentator 4a/4b with a FIVE sequence? Bobby Jo

More chaff. On -- IGNORE--. :) Bobby Jo