Search results

The religious leaders of Israel were proven to be wrong about a lot of things, including that. Why would you trust that they got that right when they were proven wrong about so many things? Paul taught that Gentiles are "fellow heirs" of God's promises (Ephesians 3:1-6), but you don't believe...

Of course it would, but where did I say that it would make sense for you to do that? Nowhere. I believe it's silly of you to not recognize that Daniel 9:26 is talking about the destruction of the physical city and sanctuary standing at the time He was cut off. You are completely missing the...

I say the same to you. It's just too bad that you believe so many things that aren't true. What exactly is your point here? Jesus said that He would draw all people to Himself (John 12:32). But, obviously, not all people believe in Him, so that means people can resist His drawing. People can...

I don't know exactly what they are like, but I believe heaven is a place of bliss while Jesus portrayed hell as a place of torment. Scripture very clearly refers to heaven and hell as real places. Wasn't even their fault? What in the world are you talking about? It may not be a person's fault...

No, He did not. In His parables He always referenced made up people, places and events/concepts that represented real people, places and events/concepts. For example, in the parable of Matthew 22:1-13 he referenced a king arranging a marriage for his son and having his servants invite people to...

Of course not. My point about Luke 16:19-31 is not that every word in it is literal. My point is that it's not a parable. Are you suggesting that any time Jesus used figurative language, that means it was a parable? That's not the case. Are you paying attention to what is actually being...

You are not comparing like things here. There is overwhelming evidence in scripture showing that Jesus is God to the point where we can say that it undeniably teaches that Jesus is God. Contrastly, there is NOT overwhelming evidence in scripture to back up your claims about Daniel 9:27, so you...

Nonsense. Are you somehow not aware why the physical city and sanctuary were destroyed in 70 AD? It was because of the Jews having cutting off and rejecting the Messiah. The destruction of the city and the sanctuary has a direct relation to the Messiah being cut off. This is an incredibly weak...

What in the world are you talking about here? You obviously don't understand what finishing the transgression is about. It's something that only Jesus could accomplish. So, let me show you how He did it. You need to learn how to interpret scripture with scripture. Finishing the transgression...

Did you not see the post where I told you that you need to learn what the word "undeniably" means? You obviously still haven't learned what it means. Your opinions are not undeniable facts. Please get that through your head. I deny that verse 27 only refers to things that occur during the 70th...

I'm not so sure that they actually asked that question as Matthew recorded it. I'll explain why I say that. I think Matthew may have paraphrased the question to help people see that Jesus answered their second question in relation to the separate event of His coming and the end of the age rather...

How exactly can the Jews make an end of sins, finish the transgression, make reconciliation for iniquity, bring in everlasting righteousness, anoint the most holy and seal up vision and prophecy apart from Jesus? I'd love to know how you think that is possible.

That is absolute nonsense. You make it as if it was foolish for Jesus to even mention the destruction of the temple at all. As if there was no point in Him even mentioning it at all. It makes perfect sense for Him to say something about it if it involved Him warning believers to flee when...

A much bigger hypocrite, eh? Which one of us complained about the insults of the other despite hurling many insults throughout this thread? I'll give you a hint. It wasn't me. It seems that maybe you don't know what the word hypocrite means. LOL. I don't admit things that aren't true. I don't...

All nonsense coming from a guy who foolishly thinks that Jesus would not be interested in giving any details at all related to the destruction of the temple buildings despite the fact that he is the one who made that prophecy. Somehow, all He cared to say about it is that the temple buildings...

You're completely incapable of refuting how I read it. I go by what the text actually says, unlike yourself. Paul clearly portrayed the resurrected dead in Christ and those who are alive and remain until Christ's parosia as being caught up together at the same time to meet the Lord in the air...

Grow up. I never said that every word in the passage was literal. What do you think, that if any word in a passage quoting Jesus is not literal then that means it's a parable? Of course not. So, don't give me nonsense like this if you want to be taken seriously. He never used the names of real...

What's this gibberish you're saying? I see that you will not admit your hypocrisy. No surprise.

Stop trying to make excuses for yourself. There is nothing indicated anywhere in Daniel 9:24-27 that there would be any gaps anywhere within the 70 weeks. Daniel 9:24 clearly indicates that 70 weeks (490 years) was the determined time period during which the things prophesied to occur within the...