Search results

Yes this below is a rule that I go by The whole of scripture is greater than the sum of its individual passages. You can not comprehend the bible as a whole without comprehending its individual passages and you cannot comprehend its individual passages without comprehending the bible as a...

Actually revelation 19 also isn’t the second Corinthians but Jesus coming in judgement with His sword just like in the verse below Rev 2:16 . 16 Repent therefore! Otherwise, I will soon come to you and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth. This is a repeated event over the...

Amen brother great post

You really assume a lot about people and make many false claims. Maybe instead of saying “you had to of learned this from a fake preacher” ask a question like “did you hear this from a fake preacher? Or instead of saying “Evidently you've never heard of the 'future-perfect' prophetic sense”...

Again you are assuming things that I haven’t said or believe please stick to what I say and stop confusing what I did say. I never said that Rome will destroy the beast I said that the beast destroyed Babylon the great. I believe that happened in 70 AD when God had Rome destroy Jerusalem...

It’s just different directions like east and west

Found out for what what are you talking about? I don’t think Rome is part of destroying Jerusalem at the end of the world you keep misquoted me and you have no idea what I believe.

The war in heaven is a more detailed description of the dragon swiping the third of the stars it showing that a third followed him in his attempt

That’s my point it’s spiritual reigning. Revelation 20 chronologically following 19 is a view many see the thousand years starting at the resurrection. The same with the second coming in chapter 19 many see it as a coming in judgement

Well Paul was eventually beheaded but they don’t have to literally be beheaded it’s about them dying for Christ in which every way. But it’s not just for the ones who die for Jesus it’s saying that even though they die for Jesus they will still reign. It’s also not literal Paul was saying that...

You just made a statement with no scriptural backing look at what Paul just said 5 made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved. 6 And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, Made us...

So was Paul wrong when he penned those verses? Scripture can not contradict scripture The whole of scripture is greater than the sum of its individual passages. You can not comprehend the bible as a whole without comprehending its individual passages and you cannot comprehend its individual...

Revelation 20:4 4 I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark...

Who does the bible show that she is? Genesis 37:9-10 9 Then he had another dream, and he told it to his brothers. “Listen,” he said, “I had another dream, and this time the sun and moon and eleven stars were bowing down to me.” 10 When he told his father as well as his brothers, his father...

You really assume a lot of things about me which I never said or believe. The pope is not the antichrist and Rome is not Babylon the great. Yes I agree Jerusalem is the harlot mystery Babylon the great but she was in the past There are no false Jews in my church and my views have nothing to do...

Yes amen

If you read Zachariah chapters 12-14 you will see that when it mentions “in that day” it talks about events of the first advent the events around the time of Jesus life on earth in the first century They will look of Jesus who was pierced The spirit of grace and supplication being poured out...

I see it as the church

I agree with the premise of this thread. So what do you make about this verse? Zachariah 14:8 8 On that day living water will flow out from Jerusalem, half of it east to the Dead Sea and half of it west to the Mediterranean Sea, in summer and in winter.

Because you omit the whole rest of that section in Isaiah 65 for one verse. So if that verse contradicts the rest of the section then it can’t be the right interpretation because scripture can’t contradict scripture this below is a rule of thumb The whole of scripture is greater than the sum of...