Search results

And there's where you're wrong - and THAT'S why you're an ignorant anti-Catholic. ALL of the Gospels and ALL of the Scriptures are relevant. You only have a PARTIAL truth within Protestantism. Come home to the FULLNESS of truth in the Catholic Church (Eph. 1:22-23).

Actually - that's a FALSE statement. I know SEVERAL Protestants who aren't liars OR ignorant and have chosen to be Protestant because they simply "disagree" with Catholic teaching. Your statement in RED is true for anti-Catholics. because I've NEVER met a single one what didn't lie. And the...

You see your comment above in RED? This is a textbook example of your ignorance of Catholic teaching. It's NO WONDER why you left. This is why I told you before - you left the Church SOLELY because of your abject ignorance of the Catholic faith, which has NEVER taught that our sins are...

Yes, common BIBLICAL sense tells me this However, I was reasoning with your anti-Catholic sense - which is why you're confused . . . If you HAD been "well-versed" in the Scriptures - you wouldn't have quoted Rom. 3:23 to "prove" that ALL have sinned.

I believe your statement above in RED. However - that's NOT the fault of the Church that you were ignorant - but YOURS. You can't blame the Church because YOU weren't engaged - any more than you can blame you r wife because you lost interest in her. And, by the way - you were born again at...

No - it's just that I've typed out the answer to you so many times - I have blisters on my fingertips. ONE more time, Einstein . . . Luke 1:28 is proof of Mary's sinlessness because the Angel calls her "Kecharitomene". This word translates as "One having been completely, perfectly and...

Uh-huh - and "Pope" is not a title, but a simple term of endearment. Look, you got this one WRONG, so just admit it and move one . . . And that is precisely the type of response I would expect from someone who just got taken to the Scriptural woodshed . . .

Yup - that's pretty much what I thought you'd say. Soooo, Jesus sinned?? Ummmmmm, babies sin?? They're part of "ALL", aren't they?? YOUR problem, as is the problem with EVERY anti-Catholic I meet is that your ignorance of Scripture causes you to believe this nonsense. Rom. 3:23 is a direct...

And what does ANY of this have to do with what I posted? Are YOU also denying that Jesus is God, when the Scriptures are crystal-clear on the mater - or did you just want to spew some anti-Catholic nonsense? Your views of the Catholic church ant its teachings are based on an abject ignorance of...

It's ALSO a sin to reject His Word. Jesus is GOD (Isaiah 7:14, Isaiah 9:6, Matt. 4:7, John 1:1, John 1:3, John 8:58, John 10:30, John 15:9, John 20:28, Acts 5:3-4, 2 Cor. 4:4, Phil. 2:6, Col. 2:9, 1 Tim. 3:16, Heb. 1:8, Titus 2:13).

Yet another idiotic post with idiotic claims made by a guy who doesn't pay attention. Melkite Catholics submit to the Pope's Authority. Maronite Catholics submit to the Pope's Authority. Coptic Catholics submit to the Pope's Authority. Byzantine Catholics submit to the Pope's Authority...

ONE more time, Einstein: WHERE do ANY of these passages make the claim that these are Mary's children?? I've already shown you several verses that show they are the children of ANOTHER woman and man. And you STILL haven't been able to show me WHY those "other" children of hers couldn't take...

HUH??? Do you even understand what heresy is?? Do you know what a heretic is?? your arguments are childish - not "child-like" with all of its perceived innocence. Childish, as in stupid and NOT well-thought-out.

As soon as YOU give me the quotes for "Faith ALONE" and "Scripture ALONE" . . .

No, I calls'em as I sees'em - and YOU are wrong about the "title" of the Pope. - Except that Christ's Church IS Catholic (Acts 9:31) - Except that this Catholic church of His was given ALL Authority in Heaven AND earth (Matt. 18:16-18, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 16:12-15, John 20:21-23) -...

It is a fact of history that many English versions of the Scriptures existed before Wycliff -let alone Tyndale. They were authorized and completely legal (see “Where We Got the Bible” by Henry Graham, ch. 11, “Vernacular Scriptures Before Wycliff”). FAR from being the “hero” of the English...

How? Please explain . . .

a. Sinless Mary (Luke 1:28) b. God impregnating Mary - Mary conceives Jesus in HER womb (Luke 1:31) c. Shepherd (Bishop) Peter (John 21:15-19) That was fun. Anything else?

That's rich. Sooooo, every time somebody CLAIMS that there is corruption - it is carved in stone as a "fact"?? So, I can make ANY ridiculous claim I want about ANY Protestant sect - and YOU have to accept it as the unvarnished truth?? That's an idiotic standard - even for you . . .

WOW. Sooooo, you can only offer "suppositions" as to why Mary's "other children" couldn't care for her because the Bible is SILENT about it. Yet you insist that she indeed had "other children" - when the Bible is just as SILENT about it. I hope you don't run your personal life with the SAME...