Search results

What were the answers? Having a different interpretation of a scripture is very different than adding to them. Now I wouldn’t put the curse on you because it’s an interpretation I didn’t say opinion I said interpretation

If so then what I have been accused of (which I didn’t actually do) you just did because you added things to the scriptures that aren’t there. Now I wouldn’t put the curse on you because it’s an interpretation

Coming on clouds was a sign of judgement like in the verse below Isaiah 19:1 A prophecy against Egypt: See, the LORD rides on a swift cloud and is coming to Egypt. The idols of Egypt tremble before him, and the hearts of the Egyptians melt with fear. Below are the real verses of the second...

They are simple questions could you please answer them?

So you think that when Jesus was talking to the disciples using the term "you see" it was actually people some two thousand years in the future? My point is that Jerusalem was destroyed within that generation just like Jesus had predicted. I'll stand by Jesus with the fufilled dated prophecy...

That's a matter of opinion Do yo believe that the thousand years will be on the earth in Rev 20? Do you believe that the thousand years will be a time of peace in Rev 20? Do you believe Jesus will be on the earth during that time in Rev 20? Do you believe that Jesus will be in the camp of...

Thanks but FYI I'm only a partial preterist there is still more to happen

Your very welcome

It’s not a sin to have a different interpretation of scripture I use scripture to interpret scripture

It is impossible for the description of the beast to be a single man Yes the Egyptian plagues were literal

Of course scripture can’t lie but it can be misunderstood. Satan also isn’t literally bound but he is restricted from doing certain things like he was bound or restricted from killing Job Revelation 20:1-3 And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, having the key to the Abyss and holding in...

Your thinking physical when only our world is physical the spiritual world spiritual. I see revelation 16:12-15 different from you it is a symbolic description of literal events The frogs aren’t literal but symbolic for unclean deceiving spirits

But that verse says unbelievers I’m talking about believers. Since the cross multi millions of gentiles have become believers. The power of the gospel binds satan from deceiving the person who accepts the gospel

I don’t see satan as physically bound and locked up only bound by the spirit from deceiving the nations through the power of the gospel

Once again sure but it’s spiritual battle. Battles can be physical and spiritual Remember Ephesians 6:12-13 King James Version 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual...

Which can happen if the binding is spiritual

Sure but I see the battle as spiritual we the church are the surrounded ones from satans armies not Jerusalem

Well the book of Job was before the cross I see the binding as spiritual satan cannot deceiving the ones with the Holy Spirit and since the cross people from all nations are saved

I think the real question is what exactly is the binding? Matthew 18:18 18 “Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.

I guess you’re being sarcastic and sorry if your not but why be that way if I corrected you? Yes I know where Rome came from but my point is that Peter in Acts chapter 2 states that he was in the days of Joel chapter 2 and Jerusalem was destroyed by Rome shortly after Peter said those words...