Search results

How is it? Pretribber have a habit of claiming stuff but are slow to biblically prove. That is telling!

What are you talking about? This does not make sense.

Read what it says, not what you have been taught: Genesis 7:11-13: "the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights. In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and...

I think you know what we know. Your doctrine is not in God's Book. That is why you present a post like this that does not in any way address the question. Your avoidance, and that of your fellow Pretribbers, confirms what the rest of us already know.

You may think he disobeyed, but i do not. I showed you the evidence in the OT and the NT. They both forbid your nonsensical argument.

Genesis doesn't say he entered the ark 7 days prior. It shows he received the instruction. Let us analyze this. Genesis 7:4-19 1 And the LORD said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation. 2 Of every clean beast thou...

You are trying to deflect away from the fact that your end-time scenario is not found in God's Book. This is something most of us already know. Your admission exposes the fallacy of you still holding unto it. It is a man-made Jesuit doctrine. The reality is: this 2-future-comings theory was...

Exactly. You have nothing. It is a man-made Jesuit doctrine that you have bought into. That is why it should be rejected. You have no Scripture because it is not in the secret text.

According to this, and according to the words of Christ, they entered the ark on the day the flood came. You are fighting with Jesus here and the fuller and more detailed NT revelation. You, like many Pretribbers, explain away the New by your faulty opinion of the Old.

Your inventing of 2 future comings in any one single text. It is incredible that anyone would buy into this. You have nothing to bring to the table apart from private interpretation. What Scripture teaches (1) a rapture of the Church, (2) immediately followed by a literal seven-year...

Christ speaks of “the days of Noe” (plural), speaking of the days that preceded the destruction of all the wicked. He then spoke of “the day” (singular), speaking of the actual day when the wicked were wiped. This contrast between “the days” and “day” is common in Scripture and is presented in...

You don't get it do you?

Jesus said in Luke 17:26-30, “as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. Likewise also as it...

2+2+2+2+2= 8 not 2222

Let us take one Scripture at a time, because when your opinion of one text is refuted, you quickly move unto another. That is the only way your argument is sustained. 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:4 confirms this saying: “if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in...

Instead of making these wild unsubstantiated statements, can you prove what you are actually saying. There is zero exegesis of texts in your posts because they do not say what you claim. You are manipulating Scripture to support your beliefs.

It doesn't say that. You say that. You cannot show that. You are fighting with Jesus. Not wise!

Pretribbers are experts at claiming things but slow to furnish actual relevant Scripture. That is because their doctrine cannot be found in the sacred text, it has to be foisted upon it. Quote the passages you are claiming that support your doctrine. Highlight where they supposedly say what you...

I wonder why you our avoiding my question. Because you have no Scripture to bring to the table. Please answer a simple question that no Pretrib can seem to answer: where in Scripture teaches (1) a rapture of the Church, (2) immediately followed by a literal seven-year tribulation, (3)...

How can anyone believe a doctrine that enjoys not one single clear proof text? Look on this thread how each Pretribber depends upon obscure theories and unfounded speculations from some Pretrib teacher who has doubtless indoctrinated them.