Search results

True!

So, they are literally doing these "activities" but you are arguing they carry a symbolic meaning? Are they literally slitting the throats of these innocent animals? Are these literal sin offerings, as they are described? Yes or no? Where does it teach that "these future Temple activities...

So, basically, you have absolutely no support in Revelation or anywhere else for your speculations. All I am getting is your opinions - private interpretation. That is not evidence. That is not acceptable. It is clear that you impose your opinions on the text and expect the rest of us to accept...

Scripture shows the regeneration of this current fallen arrangement and the arrival of the new perfected arrangement at the second coming. This exposes the Premil interpretation of Rev, which enjoys zero corroboration. It is corroboration that demolishes Premil.

Where does Revelation 20 teach this? Where in Revelation 20 does it teach that “the Mk starts with ALL Christians, a Christian world? Where in Revelation 20 does it teach that “this is the Utopia mankind has always yearned for. Paradise reborn and living with the LORD, walking with Him as Adam...

There is a lot of sidestepping of the biblical evidence. What is clear here is: no Premillenialist seems to have any answers to the Op. That is because the Scriptures presented speak for themselves. They forbid Premil.

I think we are in general agreement. I do not necessarily disagree with what you have presented. Please ask questions to clarify.

Where does Revelation 20 teach this? Where in Revelation 20 does it teach that “the Mk starts with ALL Christians, a Christian world? Where in Revelation 20 does it teach that “this is the Utopia mankind has always yearned for. Paradise reborn and living with the LORD, walking with Him as Adam...

Can you maybe outline what is unloving about the Op - the first few posts.

End-times can be divisive, agreed. People have different views. That does mean they do not have love one for another.

Can I remind you: this is a Bible discussion where we share our beliefs and/or differences?

You are living in denial. I just showed you multiple Scripture, and you avoided it. It seems like you have to to sustain your doctrine.

I am willing to give you support for Amil's placement of everything. But the burden of proof is with you to show us corroboration for all your main tenets. All I see for your core beliefs is Revelation 20. Where else in Scripture is a thousand years mentioned after the second coming? Where else...

Joel 2:10-11: “The earth shall quake before them; the heavens shall tremble: the sun and the moon shall be dark, and the stars shall withdraw their shining: And the LORD shall utter his voice before his army: for his camp is very great: for he is strong that executeth his word: for the day of...

When Premillennialists are asked to submit clear and undeniable corroboration for their placement of Revelation 20 after the second coming and each of its main tenets, they cannot do it. It is therefore a private interpretation of one highly symbolic text 3 chapters before the end of the Bible.

Really? It arrives as a day of destruction. Read it without your Premil glasses on and you will see what it is saying. The coming of the Lord will be fiery and climactic. There will be no survivors. The evidence for this is overwhelming. 2 Samuel 22:9: “There went up a smoke out of his...

You are using Revelation 20 as a dumping ground for "the last days" (Isaiah 2 and Micah 4) and “the new heaven and new earth” (Isaiah 65) passages. Sensible biblical hermeneutics are non-existent. That is because Premillennialists make it up as they go. It is clearly an engineered doctrine.

You are presenting a Pretrib scenario yet you have no Scripture. Where then do the billions of wicked rebels come from "as the sand of the sea" to overrun the age to come? The cross does not seem satisfactory, efficacious and final enough for Premillennialism. It wrongly and strongly...

This is more avoidance.

Totally agree!