Search results

Once again, you did not address anything i actually presented. That is the only way that Premil survives. Premils cannot address the multiple passages that forbid their position. You transpire to deviate off on a rabbit trail referencing passages that make no mention of a future millennial age...

You have nothing to bring to the table apart from avoidance and name calling. That is your MO. That marks every discussion you engage with Amils. When you are actually prepared to address the inspired text you may come back.

You seem very uncomfortable with addressing the inspired text presented. That might explain why you run and hid. Could that be because you see what the rest of us see - the above is Irrefutable biblical proof that death is abolished at the second coming? Let us take one clear passage that...

Not sure what your point is. Please explain.

Paul confirms the finality of the return of Jesus, in 1 Corinthians 15:22-24, stating, “as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at His coming [Gr. parousia]. Then cometh the end [Gr...

What does it matter? When Jesus returns: He introduces the eternal state? Time is gone! Whether He executes the general judgment in what we would understand as seconds, 24 hours or years makes no difference. There is no way of gauging time in eternity.

It would be nice if Premils actually addressed the scriptural arguments outlined here. But they consistently do not. They avoid.

There is nothing to rebut here, apart from you denying a plain reading of the text, and forcing 1000 years into the text where it does not exist. Premils have to do that with numerous passages. That is because the second coming is the end. This passage forbids your doctrine. You have no...

Do you accept that the figure “a thousand” (including a thousand years) and ten thousand are repeatedly used in Scripture to denote a vast indeterminate amount or period of time?

It explains your view of Revelation 20. You have no grasp of apocalyptic language and figurative terms. Do you believe Satan and his minions are physical beings? Is the dragon in Revelation 20:2 a literal physical dragon? Is the serpent in Revelation 20:2 a literal physical serpent? Is the key...

Hello! That is not a figurative passage. Revelation is the most symbolic book in the Bible. You do not seem to see the difference. Premils habitually spiritualize what is literal and literalize what is spiritual. Revelation 19 is climactic and forbids your doctrine. It also exposes the myth that...

Really? Antichrist is going to reign for 60 minutes? Even you do not believe that. That is ridiculous.

How long is the “one hour” that the beast reigns with the “ten kings” in Revelation 17:12 is? i.e. is it sixty minutes?

I did not say "highly debatable." I said "highly debated." Big difference! The term "a thousand" is used in most languages in a general figurative sense to represent a large number or a large indefinite period. Certain common numbers are frequently used in Scripture as valuable symbols to...

You prove my thesis: you interpret every Scripture through the lens of your mistaken view of Rev 20. That is your misguided obsession. Amils prefers what Paul the apostle in their hermeneutics: "what saith the Scripture?" (Rom 4:3). They interpret the highly-debated Rev 20 by the rest of...

You are not answering the question: If the last days are now and end when Jesus comes, how can you place Isaiah 2:1-6 and Zechariah 14:16-21 in a future age in-between "this age" and "the age to come"?

Do you have Scripture to support that in Rev 20?

I am not sure what this means. What is your issue?

If the last days are now, and end when Jesus comes, how can you place Isaiah 2:1-6 and Zechariah 14:16-21 in a future age in-between "this age" and "the age to come"? This alone disallows your thesis. Isaiah 2:2-4 says, speaking of the Lord’s first Advent, “And it shall come to pass in the last...

Totally agree!