Search results

Matthew 12:22-29, Mark 3:11, 23-27, Luke 10:18-19, Luke 11:20-22, John 12:31-33 Colossians 2:13-15, Hebrews 2:14-15, I John 3:8, Revelation 9:1-11 and Revelation 20:2 prove Satan was bound, defeated, incapacitated, divested of power, disarmed, brought to naught, undone, stripped and spiritually...

Yes bro! Amen!

Yes! Amen! Brilliant! I am going to add thoughts I had in a word doc to my post for others to read. Thanks for that reminder. That is why I love these studies.

Revelation 20 is speaking about "the souls" (plural) collectively reigning for the symbolic millennial period. This does not exclude those who die “in Christ” today from joining the overall ongoing heavenly millennial reign from the first Advent. If I was to say that ‘Americans have been...

Who said he was? That is a typical Premil red herring. You create a strawman and then take shows at it. You are playing games. Satan is a spiritual being. We are therefore looking in Revelation 20 at spiritual chains and a spiritual prison. The abyss is a spiritual condition. A physical chain...

This is the classic Premil tactic: hit and run. You have to! That is because their arguments do not abide biblical scrutiny.

I think you are unto to something here. Hopefully you pick on my color coding. Green is for the mentions of the New Testament heavenly city. Blue is for the spiritual application of it with the bride of Christ. While there are many references to the heavenly abode, the city of God, heavenly...

You are not quite grasping my point. I'm not talking about the actual name Amillennialist, Pre-millennialist, Post-millennialist or Past-millennialist. I am talking about the doctrine. My main point is that you have no corroboration for all of the main tenets of your position anywhere in...

I showed clear Scripture. You carefully sidestepped them. You have to. You have also been unable to address/rebut one single point I presented in the Op. That proves the veracity of the Amil position.

I recognize your frustration but it is the inspired text that forbids your doctrine. All you have is your slights "nonsense" and "clumsy" to describe your position. Your own words condemn your writings. You have no answer to the the binding of Satan 2000 years ago by Jesus and his release...

Believe what you want. It makes no difference to me. I know the truth. Because some Premils are so sold on their doctrine, it is unthinkable for them to imagine that anyone could objectively change. Well, guess what? I did. Many are abandoning Premil today. Most Amils on this board are former...

We need to piece together this symbolism and align it with history in order to establish its full meaning. Firstly, Rome was one of the four kingdoms Daniel saw. It was also the existing kingdom when John received this prophesy here. John sees five great kingdoms before the one existing in his...

You actually reinforce my arguments by your avoidance. It is there for all to see! The 7 heads belong to the beast. They belong to his body. How can a literal man embody 7 literal mountains? This is totally absurd! The whole imagery (including the beast) is symbolic.

I showed you the second coming at the end of the millennium. You ignored that.

Where does it say that? It is a figurative phrase describing the people of God. This is the problem with Premil hermeneutics: they are all over the place. There is no consistency with them. They do not recognize the symbolic setting of Revelation. They therefore literalize what is figurative...

See above!

Hello! The 7 heads belong to the beast. They belong to his body. How can a literal man be 7 literal mountains? This is totally absurd!

So, why do you not apply your reasoning to the whore, because this entity is called a "woman" or "she" or "her" this makes her a literal woman? What woman do you know that is so large that she has the ability to sit on seven mountains at the same time?

Your position is crumbling below your feet. The reader can see that for themselves. You have no rebuttals. All you have is your mistaken cut-and-paste.

I think you see the folly of your position. It doesn't add up. All you can do is go off on your aimless rabbit trials to avoid the obvious. That is why you cannot answer this enormous contradiction in your position. I will take your avoidance as an admission that your argument is moot.