Search results

And it diminishes by half his sacrifice, making it not cover the wages of sin.

Indeed. The absence of proof text does not shake the confidence in their IDOL. In 66 books the concept of the trinity is not mentioned once. This explains why they shy away from my question about why it is important to believe from a Scriptural context. It follows that since the trinity is...

Let’s explore the fallacy of equality. Fathers are not equal to their sons, which explains how Jesus was getting an inheritance AND was given all authority by God. The son comes from the father. Fathers do not come from the sons. Jesus has a human nature. Even within trinityland, this is...

Proves the trinity is anti-Scriptural, heretical to what Scripture explicitly teaches.

I don’t know if it was you or someone else in the other thread. A list of words that need to be redefined to make sense of Trinity: need to add being and Begotten. Begotten means created. They come up with the nonsensical ‘eternally begotten.’ And if you look up Being, it is synonymous with...

You are denying the divine yolk due to your enormous ego. See Eph 5:22.

More than OT quotes out of context, this is what people need to understand about Jewish Holy texts. There is one God, YHWH, who we are to love with our all (the Sh’ma, Deut 6:4). Jesus said this is the most important commandment. Jesus was a Jew born under the law, required to believe in this...

Only out of love for Christ. Wives have additional burden to submit to their husbands as to the Lord.

Oy vey! What does AFAIK mean? Definitive. ? It’s my understanding to be a total and complete fake, in terms of not be authored by its pre-Noah namesake. At best, it is apocrypha. This begs the question of why you would rely on something other than Scripture? Yes, 100%. Words have meaning...

Equality is not an escape from responsibility.

No! This contradicts your previous statement of understanding legal contracts where explicit text supersedes ambiguous text. There is ambiguous text, yes but there is also explicit text. It’s just that the explicit text proves God is one, not 3 in 1 and is not Jesus. Ex 3:15. God’s eternal...

Terrible mothers are also terrible because of how they treat the kids father.

Both. You can post and it will make some people upset. Enoch is not Scripture, right?

I think God created Jesus. None of YHWH’s creations are YHWH. Of course I disagree with exclamatory statements. Just because someone exclaims the dropped toast is feces does not make it so. The Scripture truth is that God - in his unitarian nature- sent his son. Do you disagree with the...

You are confusing <what people say> with Scriptural truth. Others said Jesus was from Satan. Does that make it true?

Using you legal standard, one should not doctrinally invest in an ambiguous text when explicit verses are available, such as 20:31, right?

I do but feel free to use verses to enlighten me.

The new and creative ways to rationalize what is not in Scripture continue to amaze. No, the precise opposite. An all powerful God does not need to be strengthened by dead prophets.

Well said! Many trinitarians presume our rejecting the doctrine is because we lack understanding. The opposite is true. We reject the inherently contradictory and contrary to Scripture doctrine because we understand it is inherently contradictory and contrary to Scripture.

Jesus is no God at all since he said the Father is the only true God.