Search results

ALL babies have the stainb of Original Sin and therefore, have a fallen nature. Circumcision was the way that a jewish male entered into the Covenant with God. Baptism is the way we enter into the NEW Covenant with God. A Covenant is a BINDING AGREEMENT. 8-day-old Jewish babies entered into a...

The MEANS is not the ENDS. That's where your confusion lies. The means is simply a tool for attaining the ends. The Bible is crytal clear that we are to be Baptized with WATER and we receive the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38). THAT'S why Peter says that this WATER Baptism now SAVES us (1...

Circumcision was entrance into the Covenant, my ignorant friend. I didn't think you'd have an intelligent response . . .

Not sure what "RCC" is - but the Catholic Church was founded by Jesus Christ (Matt. 16:18) and maintained by the Holy Spirit (John 16:12-15). Do your homework . . .

YOU don't get it because of your lack of faith. Of course the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles is "crazy stuff" to you. What is a Covenant? It is a BINDING agreement between 2 or more parties. Tell me something, Eainstein - how did an 8-day-old baby enter into a Covenant by being...

I've been arguing from Scripture - not "Papal decrees". YOU simply have no intellligent response for my arguments . . .

WRONG - that's NOT what the Catholic Church teaches. However, in the depths of your dishonesty, that's the lie YOU perpetuate. The Church teaches - as does Scripture - that it is the Holy Spirit who regenerates (John 3:5, Acts 2:38, Acts 19:1-7, Acts 22:16, Rom. 6:3-4). Water is simply the...

That's not what we teach. Baptism replaces circumcision of the flesh. Remember how 8-day-old BABIES entered the Covenant with God in the OT? Do your homework . . ..

Actualkly, says to by the Authority of Christ's Trinitarian Baptism, per Matt. 28:19. You're just not bright enough to understand that. Keep studying - you'll get there . . . Then WHY do you quote a Catholic about Baptism to prove a point - yet you reject everything else he believes?? That's...

Really? Sooooo, every BABY knew about Jesus and was upset? Every BABY knows who Trump is? Thank you for illustrating just how pathetic your grasp of Scripture is . . .

I was pointing out your hypocrisy, in that that you "follow" what Eusebius said about Baptism (not really - but in your flawed understanding) - yet you reject all of the other Catholic teachings he believed in.

Nope - your perverted understading of it is.

I guess that's thanks to Jesus's guarantee that the Holy Spirit would guide His Church to ALL Truth (John 16:12-15) . . .

That's what I thought you'd say. So, "ALL" of Jerusalem knew about the birth of Christ? "ALL" of Jerusalem was upset about it? "ALL" of Jerusalem would include every baby, toddler, deaf person, mentally-handicapped person, etc. They were "ALL" upset? OR - is this simply an example of...

Sooooo, it's just a case of Cafeteria Christianity. You actually DO pick and choose what you want to believe - and discard the rest. That's what I thought . . .

Thanks - I figured your answer would be stupid. You dance around the language in Matt. 2:3 just like you do Acts 2:38 and other places. Pray for understanding . . .

ALSO from the Bible: Matt. 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit Only, the Didache actually MATCHES this quote . . .

That's NOT what I asked you. I asked you if you agreed with Eusebius about all of his Catholic teachings qas well - OR, is this simply another case of "Cafeteria Christianity", where YOU pick and choose what YOU agree with?

Since you're both Scriptural Literalists - explain the following verse: Matt. 2:3 When King Herod heard this he was disturbed, and ALL JERUSALEM with him. Was "ALL" of Jerusalem disturbed by the news of the birth of Jesus? THINK, before you answer this time . . .

Not at ALL. I simply understand what it means, whereas, YOU don't. And I've got the entire Early Church behind me . . .