Search results

Well, it's been 5 days now and I still can't get over the shock. It's not the actual insurrection itself that spooks me. That could never have been ultimately successful. What I can't understand is how someone could be so retarded to think that it might be a good idea to break into the U.S...

And there it is, folks. OT Precedent God told Elijah to kill heretics, and so the Catholic church should be justified in killing heretics. In our day, maybe? Unless the gates of hell have prevailed against it, it should be A-okay. The cat is out of the bag. My dad used to say: "If you...

We're trying to figure out why you trust others' judgment. He gave Job a pretty thorough working over, and God regarded Job quite highly. Besides, the true church was preserved in the wilderness (Revelation 12:6) while Popery was doing its worst. And it's not a theory. It's history.

Talk about slinging mud. It must be nice not to have a label to mock. Your anti-everything trolling is really starting to get old. You're worse than Eeyore, who said things like: “Sure is a cheerful color. Guess I’ll have to get used to it.”

Jesus is all we really ever have. :)

YOU SURE DO!!!

Only 1 other occurence: Link to parallel Bibles: 1 John 4:18 Parallel: There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.

@Tong2020 You have done exactly what you always do: Twist the Scriptures; and twist the words of your brethren. I will not go to the trouble of correcting your barrage of false assumptions and representations to serve the purpose of your endless entertainment. Fool me once; shame on you...

They want him disqualified from running again in 2024. But I doubt he could ever amass enough votes after the stunts he's pulled since the election.

Because the judges were all unconvinced. It's just that simple.

My wife (who has several law degrees) and I have no political loyalties whatsoever. Not a single one of the judges (many of whom were appointed by Trump) agreed that the affidavits or witnesses brought in or video clips were conclusive in proving substantial fraud. Not one out of dozens.

If these claims were true and admissable, you don't think Trump's legal team would have submitted them as such? Anecdotal, rhetorical evidence doesn't cut it.

Or, it could just possibly mean that there was no admissible evidence to bring.

Trolling for asking questions? I guess I'm trolling, too.

There's no admissible evidence for any of this. Congress can't impeach just because you don't like someone. :)

She's becoming quite famous for it. :D

:):):) Ding, Ding, Ding!!! We have a winner!!! :):):)