Search results

So, the pouring out of the Spirit at Pentecost is the intro of the new covenant?

LOL. Yea right! You the king of your own castle in your own mind. You do not seem able to approach the sacred text with an objective analyze. You are totally indoctrinated with what the United Pentecostal Church has taught you. You seem incapable of thinking outside of that. You are Mr...

Once again, no mention of the Church, therefore in your school of thought, that means the Church is absent. That is what you have been wrongly taught. You are hung by your own noose. Revelation 12 places the defeat of Satan at the resurrection/ascension, thus refuting your argument: "And she...

It was you that was lecturing the rest of us about something you cannot do. You know one takes your lectures serious.

You find it at the end of Rev 20 and the other 5 recaps in Revelation. I gave you one above, and as is your MO, you ducked around it. You have to. That goes with being part of the denomination you belong to.

OK, give us a line-by-line explanation of 2 Peter 3 instead of lecturing others about something you are manifestly incapable of.

LOL. You have to be joking! You have a brass neck. Look in the mirror. I've never seen anybody who fails to do what they are lecturing others to do more than you. This is total hypocrisy. Take your own advice. Stop your evasive one-liners. Observers will see the deceit of your statement. They...

How was it in introduced? By what? What was lacking in it?

The book of Revelation is not chronological. It is a series of repetitions. It is a number of recaps describing the spiritual battle going on during the intra-Advent period. How could Revelation be chronological when we do not read of the birth of Christ until Revelation 12? The millennium does...

How many wicked survived in Noah's day? How many wicked survived in Sodom? You know, in both of these examples, all the elect were immediately and totally rescued and all the wicked were immediately and totally destroyed. So will it be when He appears. All the elect were immediately and totally...

Obviously, you didn't read or address the Scriptures that I presented that forbid your thesis or you would not have claimed what you did. There is no corruptible earth left for you to have a millennium in and for it to be overrun by billions of wicked. This earth and the wicked in it are going...

But that word (zōopoieō) is mentioned 14 times in the NT, not once as you claim.

Has the new covenant been introduced, in your opinion? If so when? If not, when is it introduced?

1. So, according to you, turning your back on Jesus is not sin? 2. Embracing Satan and becoming a follower of him is not sin? 3. Mobilizing in Satan's army to destroy "the camp of the saints" is not sin?

I have no interest in your error. Take it somewhere else.

OP Note Can we get this thread back to the topic at hand? No more heresy about baptismal regeneration.

Posters are expected to stay on topic in discussions.

You deny that your millennium is saturated with billions of wicked sinners as the sand of the sea even who turn their backs on Christ, reject His commands, embrace Satan, and then prepare to fight the people of God even though Revelation 20 teaches that. However, you then quote Isaiah 65:17-21...

Which post?

You finally answered. The reason you probably avoided this is because you had nothing to support your claims. You have still not answered the question and supported your allegation. Please address it or admit you statement was wrong. What verse in 1 Cor 15 are you taking zōopoiēthēsontai from?