Search results

I believe YOU were asked to provide your "interpretation", -- preferably for the 11:4 citation because it provides a definitive fulfillment, rather than a subjective interpretation/analogy/simile/fuflillment. The ball's in your court, so throw it! I dare ya ... Bobby Jo :)

"frustrated"? NO! Just honest. You should try it sometime! :) Preterism, -- LOL, Bobby Jo

... and it doesn't take a high IQ to see when a preterist chooses to be blind! :) Did I also include "deaf and dumb"? Bobby Jo

I don't think we'll make much progress if you can't find the era in which people travel 60 to 600 mph; and when you have INSTANT INFORMATION at your FINGER TIPS: Dan. 12:4 But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge...

If the Psalms is Prophetic as proposed by J.R. Church in his book "Hidden Prophecies In The Psalms", one might consider the "coincidence" of Psalms 117 which is not only the Shortest Chapter in all Scripture, but ALSO the Middle Chapter; Psalms 118 is exactly 70 years after 1948; and Psalms 119...

Really, -- I have no idea why you use platitudes except that you have no concept of Scripture or History. Now if you had a THOUGHT I'd be interested, and I'm still waiting ... :rolleyes: Bobby Jo To All, I'm often reminded of AMAZON in this Forum. On AMAZON people ask questions, and usually...

It ok if you decline to detail your doctrines which I seem to recall are false. In fact you don't even have to Post! You do have FREE CHOICE. Bobby Jo

Well, it seems that sometimes we need to do what is RIGHT. And if that means breaking man's law to obey GOD's then that's how it is. So ... Luke 22:35 And he said to them, “When I sent you out with no purse or bag or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them...

Please clarify. And you might also throw in Daniel 8, 9, & 11. -- And my money is on Scripture & History, versus what you might propose. Bobby Jo

Yeah I make a LOT of mistakes, just ask my wife, -- but I hope you enjoyed the prospect of a prophetic 153 fish! Bobby Jo

A great Post with a LOT of GOOD information; with the Scripture's end time fulfillments NOT during the time of Rome, but at the time of the end. The only hurdle is whether a person in the preterist camp can correct their views, when they won't even correct their posts after making a mistake...

Hey @n2thelight, I appreciate the note back, and it's all good! Thanks for responding! Bobby Jo

Hey, it's @n2thelight! And he's been included in the conversation regarding misquoting my Post, -- but he's apparently chosen to willfully ignore his responsibility to correct his mistake. So now, apparently both @shnarkle and @n2thelight have chosen to be disreputable. Oh well, John didn't...

Actually the Book of Revelation is not as complex as one might imagine if you have a few basic concepts. And Chapters 12, 13, 14, 17, & 18 are particularly easy given the foundation laid by Daniel. -- Perhaps if you started with Daniel, Revelation would come to LIFE! ;) Bobby Jo

... the book of Revelation for what it says and what it means! YEP. :) But be careful because there are some in this Forum who would deceive you: 2 Cor. 11:13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 14 And no marvel; for Satan...

Matt. 7:15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. Of such are MANY in this Forum! :) Bobby Jo

Luke 17:23 And they will say to you, ‘Lo, there!’ or ‘Lo, here!’ Do not go, do not follow them. Satan is casting about to see whom he will snare, Bobby Jo

... So one question which I believe @pompadour (or maybe it was @Keraz) touched on, was the 153 fish. John 21:8 But the other disciples came in the little boat (for they were not far from land, but about two hundred cubits), dragging the net with fish. 9 Then, as soon as they had come to land...

Quote Bobby Jo: It's ok. You don't have to admit that your OP is apparently a defense of the preterist position, Quote @shnarkle: Perhaps it is, who knows? I think anyone who can read between the lines knows. But as I've already said, -- it's ok to be dishonest/disreputable with your...

If anyone wants see your dishonesty, they can read: my Post #62: "if your church" @n2thelight Post #64: Notice he said "if the church" @shnarkle Post #65: Yes, I noticed that. ... and the dishonesty from @shnarkle. But I guess that's how christians (small "c") honor GOD, JESUS, the HOLY...