Search results

The very SAME Church that Jesus established - and the SAME Church that decided on the New Testament Canon that YOU adhere to. Hire's a little history lesson on how this came about . . . - The Synod of Rome (382) is where the canon was first formally identified. - 11 years after that, it was...

Soooo, judging by YOUR standards - Lutherans are Germans? Calvinists are Swiss? Episcopalians and Anglicans are British? The scary part is that you can't see how asinine your twisted logic is - because you twist your logic as you do the Scriptures (2 Pet. 3:16). According to the Holy Spirit...

WRONG. The Church cannot teach heresy OR error. Heresy and error have existed WITHIN the Church in the individuals who have espoused them. If Jesus equates His very SELF with His Church (Acts 9:4-5, Eph. 1:22-23) - it cannot contain error.

The idea that the use of "Adelphoi" would be a "mistake" if they weren't uterine siblings of Jesus is beyond asinine. I have already shown the the use of this word and ALL of its variations in the New Testament statistically show that MOST of the time, it is NOT speaking of uterine siblings...

One of the main reasons for this is that the Church is the Bride of Christ. When Paul is describing marriage between a man and a woman in Eph. 5 - he likens the Church to the woman in the marriage: Eph. 5:22-28 Wives, asubmit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of...

"Shouting" usually requires ALL CAPS or exclamation points (!!). Formatting is there simply to emphasize the text. As far as exposing you - I simply meant that you cannot argue your point on facts alone. You guys always resort to what you THINK the Church teaches. As I stated before - MY...

Where does the Bible tell you that the BIBLE is your "Sole" Authority - because MY Bible tells me that Christ's CHURCH is our final earthly Authority (Matt.16:18-19, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 16:12-15, John 20:21-23). Chapter and Verse, please . . .

I don't belong to a "Roman" Catholic Church. It doesn't even exist. I belong to The Catholic Church that was built by Christ - 2000 years ago.

Nobody's "shouting"(!!). You just don't like being exposed . . .

WRONG. I believe in EVERYTHING Scripture teaches. HOWEVER, as Scripture itself teaches - I DON'T believe it to be our "Sole Authority". Scripture itself teaches explicity that Christ's CHURCH is our final earthly Authority . . . Matt 16:18-19 I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven...

Paul was a Jewish scholar and used the word "Tadition" in the SAME way it was understood by the Jews. Sacred Tradition was the Word of God passed on ORALLY. Jesus and the Apostles relied on Tradition - as we see in the following examples: Matt. 2:23 - the prophecy "He shall be a Nazarene" is...

ly Funny - I didn't give you th Church's officially defined doctrinal positoin. I made MY case directly from Scripture.. Nice cop-out, though . . .

That's NOT what the Bible says. Nicodemus asked Jesus how qa man ius born again. Jesus answered him: John 3:5 “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born qof WATER and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God." We are born of the Spirt AT Baptism. Peter reiterates this fact: Acts...

This is a Scripturally-bankrupt statement - as are MANY pof your posts. We are vorn again at BAPTISM, as per our Lord (John 3:5). This goes for Catholics, Anglicans, Methodists and ALL Christians who are Baptized in the name of the Triune Godhead (Matt. 28:19-20).

You believe in a doctrine about Scripture - that Scripture itself rejects. That is nothing but a recipe for disaster . . .

WRONG. Paul never specifies which teachings he is talking about. He tell his readers to hold fast to WHATEVER they were taught by the Church. There is NO expiration date on 2 Thess. 2:15.

THIS, coming from a person who believes in the completely NON-Scriptural doctrinal invention of Sola Scriptura . . .

The idea that Catholics "worship" anybody other than God is just another ignorant anti-Catholic lie. Try to be more intelligent than that . . .

And I already GAVE you the Scriptural references for BOTH doctrinal positions. I ALSO reminded you that Sacred Tradition is the other source - NOT historical documents like the Protoevangelium. That's just an historical supplement. In case you forgot - the BIBLE itself puts Sacred Tradition ON...