Search results

Look back on your posts. If it is not Rev 20 it is nothing. You are fixated with that one symbolic chapter. Sadly, you are totally messed up on your interpretation of it. This distorts you view of all Scripture.

No, you seem to have a reading problem. Jesus is the firstfruits now. It is an ongoing reality. You do not seem to grasp that. This is not just simply a historic event, this phrase describes who Jesus is today.

When does this arrive? When does the first heavens and earth disappear?

This is another example, to add to the countless, where you totally avoid the exposure of the holes and contradictions in your doctrine, as they do not exist. That means you do not need to address the rebuttals. You cannot acknowledge them because to do so would force you to change, which is...

Not true! Where is a millennium mentioned anywhere here? Nowhere! So, that is a lie. You know it! How can anyone survive this? They cannot!

LOL. That is all you have now: insults. You have moved from the Premil Phase 1: avoidance, to Phase 2: name calling and insults. All that is left now is Phase 3, run.

You make your teaching up as you go along. When you have no support, you invent it by twisting the sacred detail of Scripture. You wrongly invent 2 new heavens and earths - 1 before and 1 after your supposed future millennium - in order to support the error of Premil. But, Revelation 20 makes no...

So true! Well put!

Why did you not just answer "no"? That is because no Premil can compare them because they do not correlate.

Revelation 20 is the only Scripture you want to talk about. Can I remind you, there are multiple other Scriptures in clearer settings that give us much detail in regard to the second coming of the Lord? But, you do not want to look at them because they expose your thesis.

The kingdom is handed up at the second coming. Paul confirms the finality of the return of Jesus, in 1 Corinthians 15:22-24, stating, “as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at His...

Those in Him overcome the second death through salvation (spiritual resurrection), not through physical resurrection. This is accomplished by His first resurrection. There is multiple Scripture to back that up.

Isn't it interesting in life how the perpetrator always attributes to the victim what pertains to the perpetrator? That is called projection. It is you that refuses to address the many contradictions in your theories. Why can you not answer simple straightforward questions? The Cults do that...

Every time you lose a debate this is how you conclude.

You sound like you have a bit of a victim mentality. This explains your hatred of the Queen.

Soooo true!

No, you do not. What you present does not say what you have been taught. Quite the opposite. The passages you (and Premils) promote to support Premil actually demolish it. You have zero corroboration for your private opinion of Revelation 20.

Could any Premil please do a detailed comparison between Zechariah 14 and Revelation 20 (the two main often-presented Premil proof texts)?

Jesus is the first resurrection from the grave. No one before Him defeated death. Any resurrection after Him is secondary. Jesus is "the first resurrection" (Acts 26:23 and Revelation 20:6), "the firstborn from the dead" (Colossians 1:18), "the firstfruits of them that slept" (1 Corinthians...

LOL. I will take this as the white flag for your Schofield doctrine. You have no answer to biblical arguments. All you have is childish name-calling. Standing for Reformed doctrine is better than promoting Romish error. Your Jesuit beliefs have just went up in a puff of smoke.