Search results

WRONG again. Isaiah 8:20 says absolutely NOTHING about the written Word of God. In the depths of your ignorance, you have forgotten that to the Jews, the mantle of God's Word was BOTH the written AND the oral. It encompassed BOTH Scripture AND Tradition. As I proved to you before - the false...

Thank you for beating me to the punch on this one and exposing @Rechoird's desperate lies . . .

You're dodging the issue. I asked you to prove that a severely retarded/mentally-challenged person has full use of their faculties. If you don't have full use of your faculties - then you CAN'T surrender your will. SO - does a severely retarded/mentally-challenged person have to repent in...

Babies DON'T make Covenants? Jews entered the Covenant with God by CIRCUMCISION in the OT. WHO made the Covenant with God when 8-day-old babies were circumcised in the OT?

Then SHOW me where I "denied" Scripture. If you can't - then just admit that you lied and move on . . .

Thank you for AGAIN proving my point. As a Catholic - I wholeheartedly agree that God's Word is the source of truth. However - that's NOT what I asked you guys to prove. I asked you for Scriptural proof that SCRIPURE is our "SOLE" Authority. You have all FAILED . . .

YIKES - another mind-numbingly ignorant and historically-bankrupt claim from yet another clueless anti-Catholic. Allow me to educate you . . . The "Anathemas" at Trent weren't aimed at YOU or your lifelong Protestant friends. They were aimed at CATHOLICS who went into heresy - like your...

And in the depths of your ignorance, you refuse to understand that "history" is simply a word for what has happened. There is nothing "anti-God" about history because HE is the Author. By the way - it's funny how you completely glossed over the fact that I exposed your hypocrisy in post #51 . . .

WRONG. The Catholic Church was being persecuted during this time by Rome. The first 200 years worth of Popes were martyred. There was only ONE Church - the SAME Church YOUR Protestant Fathers revolted against 1500 years later. Study your History my ignorant friend . . .

Like I educated you before - Jesus ONLY built ONE Church. That is the SAME Church we read about in the letters of Ignatius, FIRST century Bishop of Antioch. When was YOUR renegade splinter sect founded? Oh, that's right - sometime in the last 500 years - by MEN.

Your idiotic remark above in RED caught my eye - so I figured I'd ask YOU to explain the following . . . Protestant Churches Grapple With Growing Sexual Abuse Crisis : NPR Protestants can no longer dismiss abuse as a ‘Catholic problem’ Child Sex Abuse More Prevalent Among Protestants Than...

Thanks for proving my point. Here's a little lesson for you: Don't QUOTE the Bible until you LEARN what it is saying. Deut. 4:2 is talking about the Book of DEUTERONOMY and NOT the entire collection of Books that comprise the Bible. First of all - the entire Bible hadn't been written yet...

Careful - your ignorance is showing again . . . Jesus told the leaders of His Church the following: Luke 10:16 Whoever listens to YOU listens to ME. Whoever rejects YOU rejects ME. And whoever rejects ME rejects the ONE who sent ME." So Ignatius of Antioch was simply parrotting the teaching of...

I'm not a Jesuit. I'm not even a priest - and only a priest can be a Jesuit because the Society of Jesus is a priestly order. Anyway - I think you're a little angry because I asked for Scriptural proof of Sola Scriptura - and so far, you've all failed.

There you go calling Jesus a Liar again. Jesus only built ONE Church. It wasn't YOUR sect or any other sect that came out of the 16th century or after. He built HIS Church 2000 years ago - and it continues to this day. Here are the words of Ignatius of Antioch describing this very Church...

If you know the New Testament - it's NO great mystery WHY Paul didn't spend a lot of time baptizing. Baptizing is done to NEW believers and their families to incorporate them of the Body of Christ. Paul spent most of his time traveling around and setting up the Church in different locations...

First of all - I already addressed your false statement above in RED. in post #183. Secondly, answer the question that you and @Truther have so far failed to answer: HOW can a baby enter a Covenant in the OT - but NOT the NT? Remember that a "Covenant" is a binding agreement.

Sin is rebellion against God. It therefore, requires full use of one's faculties. If you can prove that a severely retarded/mentally-challenged person has full use of their faculties - then you MIGHT have a point. Until then, however, your argument is impotent . . .

Thanks - but until you answer the questions that were posed to you - your arguments have been squashed . . .

Then, perhaps YOU can answer what @GISMYS_7 completely failed to answer . . . HOW can a baby enter a Covenant in the OT - but NOT the NT? Remember that a "Covenant" is a binding agreement.